patching...
Update: Are you following us on Facebook? Like us at http://facebook.com/oswegoILpatch
Welcome back, Patch Blogger!

District 308 Makes Contract Proposal to Teacher's Union, Union Decides Not to Vote on Proposal

The Oswego Education Association union has been without a contract since June. At issue in negotiations are the length of the high school teacher work day and teachers' salaries throughout the district.

 

The Oswego District 308 School Board and the Oswego Education Association (OEA) union continue to negotiate a new contract, with working hours for high school teachers and salaries the two main sticking points. 

Teachers have been working without a contract since June 30, and the School Board heard a negotiations update from its attorney, Maureen Lemon and their Monday night meeting.

The District submitted its most recent proposal Nov. 8 and requested the proposal be presented to the entire OEA. The OEA’s bargaining team indicated they needed to have their executive committee review the proposal before deciding whether to submit it to their membership for a vote.

As of late Thursday evening, OEA president Darla Medernach said the OEA had decided not to put the proposal to a vote for their membership.  

"We are trying to find something fair and equitable," she said. "We're still negotiating."

At issue in negotiations is the high schools transition from the block to flex-8 scheduling and how that affects the length of the teacher work day. The new 8-period scheduling keeps teachers in school longer, but has them teaching less each day, said Lemon. Flex-8 creates additional passing periods and a longer lunch for teachers.

The expired contract included a 40-hour work week for all teachers, with 27 hours devoted to student contact time and 13 hours for lunch, preparation and planning. This included five periods of classroom instructional time, one prep period, one supervision period and one duty-free lunch period. The OEA has requested to keep the high school workday as outlined. 

The board had proposed the flexibility to assign teachers six instructional periods with one prep period or five instructional periods with one prep plus one supervision period.

In February, the OEA and district administrators reached a tentative agreement for the high school teachers’ work week and work day for the current school year. The District’s two high schools were staffed for the current year based on this tentative agreement.

Due to the agreement, about 9,000 minutes of daily instructional time had to be covered by additional staff members, said Lemon. The cost of this extra staffing is estimated to be between $900,000 and $1.6 million.

Lemon said the arrangement was made without the board’s approval by previous administrators who have since left the district.

“Logistically it was too late to change for the current school year,” she said.

Board President Bill Walsh said the board honored the tentative agreement for this year, but changes would be needed for the future.

“Because the Board was never made aware of the commitments made by the previous administrators, the negotiations have been prolonged,” he said.

Another point for negotiation is teacher salary. The district had offered, based on a three-year contract, a half-percent salary increase the first year, a 1 percent increase the second year and a 1.5-percent increase the third year along with lane increases.

There would be no salary step increases, said Walsh. However, he added, not advancing a step on the salary schedule has no impact on the teacher’s seniority within the district or the Teacher Retirement System.

For instance, a teacher with five years of service would have eight years of service credits at the end of a three year contract.

“It is important to note, that lane movement is available, which can be obtained through additional post graduate hours,” Walsh said.

Medernach said the OEA has met with the district’s negotiating teams numerous times since January and have met three times in joint meetings with a mediator since October.

She said she had hoped the negotiations would be finalized earlier in the year; however, the process was delayed because new administrators hired by the district in recent months “need(ed) to be caught up to speed.”

Medernach said finding an agreement before winter break would probably be pushing it, but she’s hopeful another meeting will happen soon and said, “Progress is being made.”

At this time no new meetings have been scheduled. 

Related Topics: Contract Negotiations, Oswego 308, Oswego Education Association, and teacher negotiations

Jim Reynolds

8:51 am on Friday, November 16, 2012

I have to ask...... Where is the info from the Teachers? I se Mr. Walsh's rosy picture of what is being offered but I do not believe that paints a accurate picture of what's really going on in the District. Does anyone actually think that so many people have left the District due to the rosy work enviorment and support they recieved? I don't think so. The Board and Administration needs to not only compensate the Teachers but also give them the support they need to do their jobs and Educate the children in the District. They have had a adversarial relationship with the Teachers and have provided NO leadership. It starts at the top people.......

Reply

John Smith

9:21 am on Friday, November 16, 2012

I am not surprised the union has decided not to vote on such a contract. Why would any person agree to a contract that has no raises or compensation built in based on years of service. While I understand the financial obligations of the board, they don't realize what this will do to the quality of teaching within this school district. Why on earth would any teacher want to work in this district that clearly does not value teachers?

Does anyone else notice the number of administrators leaving this district? This surely is not a coincidence but rather an indication of a less than effective school board or a negative culture within the district. I am confident many teachers would leave if they could as well but frankly they are afraid of being unemployed. The school board needs to recognize they are not running the district nor should they be. They are a community liaison and not educators. Trust the administrators and teachers to do their jobs and make sure they are adequately compensated for doing so.

Reply

JMH

9:37 am on Friday, November 16, 2012

I agree with you John! Do we want the teachers to leave like all of the administrators are? They are the ones education our children!

Reply
Comment_arrow

Rachael B.

12:27 pm on Friday, November 16, 2012

Based on student scores, these teachers that you want us to support aren't doing a very good job of educating our students. Seems we would do well to find some replacements.

Comment_arrow

JDK

5:31 pm on Saturday, November 17, 2012

You need to pull your head out....many of these teachers are doing the parents job! I'd gather evn yours if you have kids. It's not the teachers.....whom, if you did your research, have have been offered a .5 percent raise over the next three years. I hate unions, but they have a legit beef with an overpaid superintendent. Parents are failing there kids, not teachers in oswego.....you know how many don't show for conferences? Ask around before you open your uneducated mouth.

Comment_arrow

JDK

5:33 pm on Saturday, November 17, 2012

Comment meant for Rachel B. One of the enlightened 50 per centers who chose another 4 yrs of failure. Bright move.

Comment_arrow

Rachael B.

12:02 pm on Tuesday, November 20, 2012

Jonathan, you're all over the board with your comments and angry with me for some reason. Take your anger out on the school district. My point still stands -- Based on student test scores, our teachers are not educating our students. That's what they're hired to do, what they're paid to do, without accountability. Parents may be failing their children, and teachers are, as well.

JMH

9:38 am on Friday, November 16, 2012

Please support our teachers!

Reply

Mommy4gbbg

9:52 am on Friday, November 16, 2012

As a teacher (not in Oswego) and a parent of students in 308, I was so pleasantly surprised to see such positive comments in support of our teachers! Thank you for recognizing the importance of compensating our teachers and offering them the support they need to perform their jobs effectively. There are many amazing teachers in our district and I can assure you that the pay is not their motivation for staying. Please let your teachers know how much you appreciate them!

Reply

KB

10:12 am on Friday, November 16, 2012

How can the teachers possibly be teaching less if they now have 5 classes that run for an entire semester verses 3 longer classes that they ran for a trimester? Plus they also have a lot more papers to grade and students to assist. In core subjects like math the teachers are always helping kids after school hours so the kids can make a passing grade. Many teachers spend long hours at home on their own time grading papers and preparing tests and lesson plans.
I don't get it. There were many discussions about whether to switch back to semesters. If it was going to cost so much, why was it done? The teachers obviously were not the ones making the final decisions. They weren't asking for raises. They just wanted a contract. And looks who's paying the price for it now- the teachers and possibly our students, if the teachers decide to strike.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Dave Bucher

1:16 pm on Wednesday, November 21, 2012

The block system was not on trimesters.

ConcernedParentAndTaxPayer

10:28 am on Friday, November 16, 2012

The facts are that 85% of the District's expenses are in Salaries and Benefits, the District is operating at a $4 million deficit in the current year (partially because of the HS work schedule metioned in the article above and partially because the state decided to whithhold $4 million in additional funding in spite of a 66% income tax increase that was supposedly going to support education). My bet is the Board would love to pay the teachers more, but they simply can't afford to do so. This is not about judging the "value" of the teachers. Unfortunately the economy is such that tax payers can't afford more and in fact 75% of them voted to REDUCE their taxes by 20%. The District already operates much more efficiently then all of its peers . . . because it HAS to. There is is less business and industry to support the District then in others and the District is growing in student population while the tax base (home values) continues to shrink.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Louie's Bro

10:58 am on Friday, November 16, 2012

First as to the ballot question, If you ask anyone if they want to pay less for anything, no one would say no. It was a stupid question to even be on the ballot. It didn't ask are you willing to have your services reduced to save 20% on your taxes.

Second I would like to know where you came up with 85% of the budget is salaries and benefits. The budget doesn't show that, 36% instruction, 42% support, 6% Payments to other districts, 16% for debt. (http://www.oswego308.org/assets/5/finance_business/Oswego_School_Dist_308_Final_FY13_Budget.pdf)

Hellen Smith

10:38 am on Friday, November 16, 2012

I find it laughable that the board continues to stress an "8 hour work day". This statement alone shows that the board does not understand the daily responsibilities of a teacher and the workload that is brought home. In District 202, District 203, Geneva, Yorkville, and Aurora, teachers are compensated for teaching a 6th period class by 20% (this is also true for the majority of the state of Illinois). HOWEVER, the school board believes it is okay for teachers in Oswego to teach 6 periods without compensation. They will only compensate teachers 10% for teaching a 7th period class. Oswego is losing administrators and will soon start losing teachers....

Reply

JMH

10:48 am on Friday, November 16, 2012

The transition to the Flex-8 schedule has been difficult for students and teachers this year. The students have more homework and the teachers have significantly more students, tests and papers to grade. They need our support to make it through the transition! They need our support right now. We cant take back earlier decisions just because we dont like them now. The cost was known when the new schedule was agreed upon. Stick to what you agreed to!

Reply
Comment_arrow

Louie's Bro

11:01 am on Friday, November 16, 2012

Though I agree the change has been tough, I do not believe they need to be compensated for it. Did they take a pay cut when they went to block schedules? No. Sorry but the high school teachers now have to teach the same format the jr high teachers. Suck it up.

Comment_arrow

Phil Hayes

12:04 pm on Friday, November 16, 2012

Totally agree with Louie's Bro - high school teachers not being asked to do anything jr. high teachers aren't doing - I believe 308 has some fantastic teachers at all levels but fair is fair. A few of those who are commenting need to be better informed - trimesters??? - when have we been on trimesters? The fact of the matter is that raises are not freely flowing in any profession right now - even teaching. From my reading of the article it looks like they were offered a contract which includes rasies - not huge, but raises. How many people have not only been without a raise in years but have actually taken paycuts? Many many people in the country are now working more and making less. It's time for a reality check.

Comment_arrow

JimmyJ

7:05 pm on Friday, November 16, 2012

I have friends teaching at OHS and believe me, they are not happy. But not for the reason you suspect. Neither of them have ever been pleased that the teachers contract ( as in the ALL of the teachers) is so driven by just the high school teachers wants and needs. Neither of them enjoyed the change from the traditional schedule to the Block that were on record as believing it was a mistake. They are glad to have a return to a more traditional schedule. They are older teachers and remember what it used to be like. So we'll see. There are districts that run 10 periods, teaching 9 a day so 6 or 7 isn't too bad.

Barbara Smith

11:33 am on Friday, November 16, 2012

What's fair isn't always what's equal. Every neighboring high school teaches 5 graded periods in high school. Do your homework! While junior high teachers may teach 6 period, they are often blocked. Can you imagine a high school English teacher who has 32 students in a class, grading 192 research papers, and then supervising a guided study? Qualified teachers will run from Oswego. The board knew the Flex-8 schedule would cost more money and they did it anyway.

Reply
Comment_arrow

JimmyJ

7:18 pm on Friday, November 16, 2012

I went to Lane Tech in the late 70's. School started at 7:15am with 0 period and ended at 3:30pm with 10th period. Yes teachers taught 7, 8, 9 periods. Not all of them, it depended on what they were teaching, some like the shop classes and music were double periods. In the morning I had all the single class period classes, math, english,history, etc. Then lunch and in the afternoon I had two class periods of 50 minutes for biology and lab, then a study hall and a double period for concert band and often the band director kept us after to 4 or 415. Lane Tech at that time was rated one of the best schools in the state. Our concert band was rated #1 in Chicago for 33 consecutive years. I don't think a teacher starting today could handle it. Too much work.

Concerned Individual

11:52 am on Friday, November 16, 2012

The biggest issue I see with this is that the school board had all summer work with the union and develop an acceptable contract. The school board took the teachers for granted by putting this off until the school year started. The last thing teachers want to do is strike, they understand how it hurts the students. But, if the school board is going to leave the teachers with no other choice then the school board is the one to blame. This school board in 308 has been going down hill fast. I can probably count on one hand the number of members who actually know what they are talking about. Whose bright idea was it to leave decisions on education matters up to individuals who have no background in the education world and have no idea what actually takes place in a teacher's work schedule after the bells ring.

Reply

Loreta J.

11:58 am on Friday, November 16, 2012

there was a big push for the "block" system in the 90's. There are pro's and cons to each type, the block, and the "flex 8". some say flex 8 is better since kids are exposed to every subject all throughout the year and the retention of material is better. Plus, some say it's easier to stay focused for a shorter period, than a long one. Either way, it is what it is, now, and I just hope an agreement is reached that is fair to all.

Reply

mike ellison

12:07 pm on Friday, November 16, 2012

These are the same teachers whose students are not meeting the various educational standards by a huge amount; and they want a raise? Where else can you be a loser in your job and demand more money?

Where else can the employees force the employer to run their business in the way in which the employees desire?

Reply
Comment_arrow

Louie's Bro

1:20 pm on Friday, November 16, 2012

Really? Consistently (with the exception of science) since 2009 ISAT scores have increased. In this year's ISATs, 308 outperformed state averages by 30% points. Admittedly 2012 looks like an anomaly (state averages really bombed) however even in 2011 308 outperformed the state by 4-9% depending on the subject area. Oh and to answer your question "Where can you be a loser in your job and demand more money?" Any professional sport, a lawyer, weather man (I can continue if you'd like)

Comment_arrow

Hellen Smith

2:59 pm on Friday, November 16, 2012

BAD TEACHERS WILL STAY... GOOD TEACHERS (and new teachers) WILL LEAVE. So, this decision by the board will encourage good teachers to leave the district (if possible)....which is a REAL possibility..........

Comment_arrow

JimmyJ

7:22 pm on Friday, November 16, 2012

Where can you be a looser and ask for more money? When you work in a tax payer supported operation. This is why there will never be a voucher system. Everyone here is so worried about the teachers. What about the students. My last one attends a private school in Aurora because I'm tired of mediocrity. So I pay twice. I sent two through 308 and I wish I had not now.

Comment_arrow

Lil

7:36 am on Saturday, November 17, 2012

I think that you need to look at this school board a bit closer. There have been petitions for certain members to being asked to resign due to negligence, and not following proper protocols.

There were 5 meetings, that we know of, where proper recordings were not done. Either the record button was not hit on the tape recorder or on the camera for proper documentation of closed meetings. And what happened there? Nothing. They received a "slap on the hand." They were not held responsible. I believe if you or I did something that ignorant, and did not effectively take responsibility for the mistake, we would be out of a job.

I am asking you, and so maybe others that are posting against your opinions, to think outside of your box. This is a school we are talking about. I understand that you are having issues with a certain teacher in this district, but to place all the educators in your blanket statement is absurd. This is not a corporation that should be held to the same standards as let's say Hostess for example.

In my opinion, I personally feel that all students should go to to school and hand their favorite teacher, guidance counselor, or coach a twinkie. Because those employees stood up for themselves, and I applaud them. Just like I applaud every educator, counselor, and coach in this district.

Comment_arrow

Mike Smith

7:48 am on Saturday, November 17, 2012

Unfortunately many parents feel that the learning process begins and ends within the school. The real reason many kids fail is that parents fail to work with their kids at home. It takes a lot more for a student to be sucessful than what a teacher can do with them (28-30 students) in the class room. You have to apply what you learned from the instructor to be a sucessful student.

Olivia5307

12:23 pm on Friday, November 16, 2012

"The expired contract included a 40-hour work week for all teachers, with 27 hours devoted to student contact time . . ." So the teachers are in the classroom only 68% of the week??? And only 9 months of the year? (They receive personal vacation time, in addition to the school vacation calendar.) Then they're already overpaid.

Reply
Comment_arrow

It's True You Know

5:40 pm on Friday, November 16, 2012

Your post actually has SOME truth to it. “The expired contract has a 40-hour work week for all teachers, with 27 hours devoted to student contact time.” Ok, this is actual classroom time, but now let us add in the before and after school time spent with students needing help as well as prep periods where teachers assist students and time put into clubs, organizations and sports. Next, please do not forget to factor in the hours put into planning, grading, preparing homework and exams that is usually done at home. Suddenly 40-hour work week becomes 50 or even more. If you take the teachers average salary and divide it by students and hours in the classroom you would be surprised how cheap education really is.

Comment_arrow

Mike Smith

10:40 am on Saturday, November 17, 2012

Olivia, not sure where you get your information from, but, teachers in 308 do not receive "personal vacation" time!!! Unfortunately, you think the Teacher's day ends when the kids go home. Try countless hours of prep work, grading and lesson planning on their own time taking away from their own families. All without additional compensation!

Comment_arrow

TS

12:55 pm on Wednesday, December 5, 2012

Well, lets see Olivia! They hopefully get a lunch. When would you like them to plan lessons, grade papers, create assessments, make copies, put up bulletin boards, etc etc???? Clueless

Comment_arrow

JimmyJ

1:11 pm on Wednesday, December 5, 2012

@TS...so how did teachers manage to do it when we went to school?

Comment_arrow

TS

1:26 pm on Wednesday, December 5, 2012

Well Jimmy, I believe it may have been a difficult job then too. Now it's more! Whole group reading, guided reading groups, whole group math, small group math, science soc studies, language, writing, spelling and lets not forget building character, and helping some with self esteem, bullying, social skills, and proper hygiene. Oh and 25 plus kids in a classroom. More and more gets dumped on teachers to teach and do, especially elementary teachers. The judgements on here are unbelievable. If you're going to give the big kids a raise, then you better figure out a way for the little ones doing all the work.

Gettin By

12:35 pm on Friday, November 16, 2012

I appreciate how hard the teachers work and how much work they take home every night, but the sad fact is there are lots of professions doing that right now. The high school day is what?- 7:30 to 2:30 - by my math that is seven hours - add in a lunch, planning period, etc. I know they didn't go into teaching to get rich, but I have a college education and am working for way less than their average salary without an hour lunch, planning period, a two week winter break, week spring break, three months off in the summer and great insurance benefits - I don't mean to sound bitter, but sign me up.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Reality

7:02 pm on Saturday, November 17, 2012

Get an education degree and apply....

Comment_arrow

JimmyJ

1:13 pm on Wednesday, December 5, 2012

Type 75 I think it's called. There are several teachers at OHS in particular who were in private business / industry and got a certificate and are now teaching. A couple hope to go back to the private sector.

Comment_arrow

JimmyJ

1:15 pm on Wednesday, December 5, 2012

@Reality...you don't need a degree in education to get a teaching certificate. People with building trade skills, foreign language skills and just about anything you can imagine can get a teaching certificate. I forget the website, maybe the State Board of Education? I went there to look up something about certification nd found there are many paths to the classroom other then the standard 4 year BS/BA degree in Ed

Comment_arrow

Olivia5307

4:29 pm on Wednesday, December 5, 2012

Type 75 is an administrator's certification.

Comment_arrow

JimmyJ

4:37 pm on Wednesday, December 5, 2012

Olivia..yes that's right. I wasn't sure. The point I was making though is that you don't necessarily need an education degree to be a teacher. From http://www.isbe.state.il.us/certification/html/becoming_teacher.htm

" Individuals who already hold a bachelor’s degree from a regionally accredited college or university and have related work experience may be interested in one of Illinois’ Alternate Certification Programs. "

There are other paths to becoming a teacher.

Jen

1:22 pm on Friday, November 16, 2012

I've seen it written here once before, and this pretty much sums it up.

TEACHER MAFIA. ADMINISTRATION RINGLEADERS

Point blank. These are public servants for cripes sake. Get a grip Illinois.

Maybe "WE" should NOT decide to renew their contracts. That's how it should be. Everyone is replaceable, especially teachers.

Discusting Greed is all this is.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Louie's Bro

1:30 pm on Friday, November 16, 2012

Yeah! Lets fire them all, shut down the schools, stop paying the Police and Fire department, sell off streets and sanitation's assets, turn off the water and stop up the sewers. Sounds like a fabulous idea.

Comment_arrow

JimmyJ

7:25 pm on Friday, November 16, 2012

I love all the support for teachers....then when the District comes hat in hand for a tax referendum.....it's I pay enough....I can't afford it.....you can't have it both ways. In effect we pay them through our tax money. So if you want to pay them more, we have to pay in more. How much of a raise did you get last year?

Jen

1:25 pm on Friday, November 16, 2012

Also.....I want to see a real figure as to what they are paid "Hourly" inclusive of ALL benefits and perks. Every man, woman and child would be appaulled. They are truly full of themselves.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Louie's Bro

1:36 pm on Friday, November 16, 2012

Then go to the District 308 web site. Its all there, you can look up the salary for any 308 employee.

Comment_arrow

Loreta J.

1:44 pm on Friday, November 16, 2012

You can see every single teacher's salary from the website for the 2011-2012 contract on the 308 website. Many of my son's 7th and 8th grade teachers are around the mid $50K range with benefits around $20 or so, give or take.

Comment_arrow

Reality

3:07 pm on Friday, November 16, 2012

I am APPALLED at your spelling. Makes it hard for me to buy your argument. FYI: Discusting is not a word.

Jen

1:38 pm on Friday, November 16, 2012

@ Louie's Bro
There are plenty of people who are unemployed that would proudly take any of those positions you mentioned for a fair salary. You're a brainiac. Good Idea!!!

Reply

Lil

1:46 pm on Friday, November 16, 2012

The Oswego School Board never ceases to amaze me! I am absolutely floored by how incompetent and unappreciative they seem to be of the teachers in this district. These are the people that are shaping the future of not only this country, but also the surrounding communities. These hard-working and dedicated teachers do a job that many people take for granted. If it was an easy job, then we would all do it. Many of these teachers work second and possibly third jobs to take care of themselves, and their families. It is also true that many of them work summer jobs, and take endless hours of continuing education classes each year.
So it is safe to say, that only should they be awarded the tentative contract that was placed by previous board members, they should also be applauded.

Please correct if I am wrong, but I do believe they held 5, that is right, 5 meetings this past year without properly recording the information. And if I am also correct, I believe there really was not any formal discipline. And please do not even get me started on the new superintendent!

To offer have a tentative contract stating that, and then to renig on that offer something so low is a disgrace! If there is a strike, I will stand proudly with my placard while chanting all the days of the strike to show my appreciation. What will you do fellow parents, and fellow Oswegoians?

Reply
Comment_arrow

JMH

2:05 pm on Friday, November 16, 2012

I agree with you 100% Lil!

Comment_arrow

TS

11:43 am on Saturday, November 17, 2012

Lets not forget all the money teachers spend on supplies, etc. from their own pockets! Most of you have no clue!

Comment_arrow

Olivia5307

8:51 pm on Sunday, November 18, 2012

Lil, yes, our teachers are shaping the future of our country, and they're not doing a very good job of it. Our kids are not receiving a good education! And what gives you the idea that all of our teachers are hard-working and dedicated? Maybe 20%. As for pay, teachers are hardly making minimum wage. Their salaries are generous. If they're working multiple jobs, then they surely are not doing any teacher prep work at home. Seems they're making the most of the early hours that they leave school.

Concerned community member

2:37 pm on Friday, November 16, 2012

I have mixed feelings I relation to some of these comments...

1. Education begins at home. Teachers work to educate children but without support at home, it makes it tough.

2. Does the community remember that they voted this board in? Seems a little silly to vote for someone you don't believe will do right by your children.

3. Why is this mainly focused on the high school? This is a COMMUNITY SD therefore issues addressed should be for everyone. There are a number of issues surrounding jr. high and elementary that rarely even get brought to the negotiations process because "the high school takes presidence.." Split into an elementary district and a high school district if you're not you to be equitable.

4. Teachers also need to be realistic. Economy is bad and morons are running the state of Illinois.

5. @Mike- where else can you be a loser at your job and demand a raise? Try every government job. What person who has a contract works for four months without one? Anyone can become a teacher. @Gettin By- you do sound bitter. Pretty sure every four year college has an education program.

I truly hope this is addressed soon. It's sad for this community to be so divided and the kids are the ones who lose out.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Lil

7:39 am on Saturday, November 17, 2012

I could not agree with you more! I am so thankful someone else was able to spell it out so elegantly.

mike ellison

2:54 pm on Friday, November 16, 2012

If they don't like working without a contract then get a job elsewhere. It's called the free enterprise system. But bad teachers aren't in demand and that's why they need the union to protect them, or esle they wouldn't survive in the 'real' employment world on their own. If they could, then they'd be leaving the District to get employment elsewhere.

I've asked before and never seen a good answer. But what value can you place on tenure? It's like a lifetime contract for a job and is worth an amount easily into the 6 figures. If you don't think so then try self employment where you have to prove your worth every single day in order to make a living. Same with any gov't job where it's pretty much assumed that it's yours forever.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Louie's Bro

4:55 pm on Friday, November 16, 2012

"If they don't like working without a contract then get a job elsewhere" Well I guess I ask why do you live here? I have looked at a lot of your posts and you don't appear to like anything about the area. Why don't you just exercise your right to move?

Comment_arrow

JimmyJ

7:28 pm on Friday, November 16, 2012

Maybe the teachers should go on strike like the Hostess bakers did... the bakers went on strike at a bankrupt company....are you telling me school districts in Illinois are solvent?

Comment_arrow

Lil

8:12 am on Saturday, November 17, 2012

Again, we are talking about school systems. They do not function nor should they function like a corporation. The Union does not only support "bad teachers" as you put it. They insure teachers have a fair contract, allowed to get a step or lane increase, and to solidify and protect their retirement. Sure, there may instances where a union rep is used for other means, but you are totally missing the point here. These people have been working with NO contract since July. There was a tentative contract previously put in place. The new board completely took that away. How would you feel if you were told something was going to be given to you regarding your salary, and other important factors for your job, then, because there is a new CEO, that tentative written and recorded agreement was taken away from you? I am sure you would not be too pleased. Like most of us would be. It is normal to feel that way.

I am an educated person. I do realize that there are a lot of people that are unemployed or forced to work a job they would normally not work in order to provide for their families. Do you not think they are trying to provide the same thing for their families? Do you not think that they are concerned about how they will pay for their bills? Student loans? Mortgages? Plan for their future?

Lastly, may I had these teachers have to prove their "value" and "worth" every single day! Like I stated before, this is NOT an easy job. If it was, everyone would do it.

Concerned community member

3:14 pm on Friday, November 16, 2012

The good teachers are leaving Mike. I do agree with your comment on tenure, good teachers don't need it. However, without tenure GOOD teachers may be easily let go because they are simply too expensive. School's are not for profit and therefore should act a such.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Lil

8:14 am on Saturday, November 17, 2012

This is correct!! In case Mike has not noticed, there have been several of really, really good teachers and administrators that have left this growing district because of issues with the school board. Why should this district and these children continue to loose some of the best people because of this. Why should another district benefit from the talent that 308 lost?

Concerned community member

3:46 pm on Friday, November 16, 2012

And yes, I should probably read before posting. I have so many mistakes.

Reply

Martin

3:57 pm on Friday, November 16, 2012

Sounds like the BOE put forth a good faith effort in these trying economic times. Granted what is being said by the Board has to be taken with a grain of salt because it is their point of view. And with nothing from the Union except, we're not going to vote on it yet, doesn't really mean anything.

I just hope the teacher's continue to teach at the levels they have been. Most (if not all) of the teacher's my children have had over the past 6 years have been excellent...as have the building Admins.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Martin

4:31 pm on Friday, November 16, 2012

Let's see....Bednarcik, Boulder Hill, Brokaw, East View, Homestead, OEHS, Southbury, and Wolf.

Comment_arrow

Louie's Bro

4:52 pm on Friday, November 16, 2012

I have no complaints with the education my kids are receiving either, its why I still live here. They are at OEHS and Bednarcik. Are there times I don't agree with an assignment or grade, sure, but that's life. All in all I think they have receive a top notched education.

Comment_arrow

Lil

8:18 am on Saturday, November 17, 2012

Yes, Martin, the BOE did put something into place in good faith!! Instead, the gave them something that was unreasonable. Had the new board just left it as is, then this would not even be an issue. This BOE needs to get off their high hats and honor that agreement.

The reason why the Union only stated what they did is because technically, this is not suppose to go public. Someone from the board already spoke with someone from the Beacon News discussing contract negotiations. And it was put in the press before the teachers were even aware of what the offer was on Wednesday afternoon.

Jane Enviere

5:19 pm on Friday, November 16, 2012

I rather doubt teachers will be packing up and leaving because so few districts are hiring. This is especially true if you are talking about an experienced teacher and/or one with a graduate degree. Why? They are too expensive to hire in most districts. There are so many unemployed teachers, new college grads with certificates who can't get jobs, etc., that it is unreal. That said, we have had excellent teachers and we appreciate how difficult their jobs are. Having spent quite a bit of time in the classrooms and schools here, I am bemused by those who seem so dismissive of the effort and professionaism that I have seen and experienced. We have some great teachers in this district. We probably have some terrible ones, too. Same goes for servers in restaurants, doctors, repair people, etc.

I hope that they are able to reach an agreement that is fair to the teacher and workable for the rest of the stakeholders Good luck to all!

Reply
Comment_arrow

Lil

8:41 am on Saturday, November 17, 2012

The thing is Jane, they are leaving. And not just to make more money, but they left because they did not like the way things were being handled by the board. Even in some cases, higher up administrators. So we have to see that the board is a HUGE issue and something needs to be done about it.

We need to be better educated about who is running, and their background. Having a president that does not work nor has never worked in education is not affective. Having people on a board who cannot press play at closed meetings for proper record keeping, is not acceptable. In fact, it is inappropriate.

In order for things to get better in Oswego, not just for education, but for the community as a whole, change needs to take place.

Comment_arrow

Jane Enviere

2:01 pm on Saturday, November 17, 2012

Lil -- there is not going to be a mass exodus of teachers unless they obviously desire time away from the working world because very few will be hired. The administrators are a different issue. I am talking about teachers. It won't happen. People leave jobs all the time, but it's disingenuous to believe that we are going to see huge amount of teachers leaving the district. It won't happen. It's not that easy to be hired as an experienced teacher.

There is no requirement that a board president have a background in education and it's very common for school board members to come from backgrounds outside of education. They represent the community and whether you like this board or not, the community (who cared enough to vote, whether you agree with their choices or not) made their choices. I'm not sure that I want to see a Board of Ed made up all education professionals. Not sure that would be much different than just letting district administrators call all the shots without oversight.

Now, if you have statistics that show 308 has had an alarming rate of teacher turnover tied to resignations, I'd be interested in seeing it. But, I'm pretty sure that's not the case.

It's True You Know

5:38 pm on Friday, November 16, 2012

@ Rachel B – Before we can start basing any critique on our schools and educators we need to first make sure that education starts at home and cooperation is met between the parents and the teachers and also that the “Standardized Testing” is equally fair in content and participation. If parents are not involved in a positive manner in their child’s education we might as well throw the towel. Education starts at home but also needs to follow through at home through good examples and holding accountability. Speaking of accountability; standardized testing only works if the exams are taken sincerely and thoroughly. When a percentage of students do not care a less about their scores and simply “ABCDABCDABCD” their scores they are skewing the results and only hurting the program.

In surveying the public we create questions that are similar and easy to answer to ensure that the scores result in the same answer. When they do not we throw that sample or test out. Why can’t we get two scores? A cumulative and a true score sample.

Reply

JimmyJ

7:34 pm on Friday, November 16, 2012

@ It's True....... I would add to your comment about involvement that parents can't simple walk their child to the bus stop or drop them off and then get them in the afternoon assuming that everything is fine and dandy. You have to be involved. You pay for it.

Reply

Walt Hines

8:31 pm on Friday, November 16, 2012

Why is it okay to pay $25,000.00 above what Dr. Odonnell made but we can't give the teachers a raise. These are the same people that are in the classrooms morning, noon and night educating our children.
For the people who don't like what's going on, move. Yah you're going to loose your butt on your home but at least your kids won't be in a sub-standard school system. I can't believe these teachers, they come in early to meet with students who are falling behind, they stay late to do the same and then the nerve of them to want to head-up an after school sport or club, go figure. I say chain them to their desks, give them 2 bathroom breaks during passing periods only and if they can keep the little monsters in their seats we'll see what we can pay them. Good grief be happy you have a job, and you thought you were going into this field to make a difference in a child's life. Honestly, what were all of you thinking.

This is what's wrong with this country. We can line the pockets of the corporations with bonus after bonus but the people who matter the most are the ones we throw in the crapper. No wonder our kids are so screwed up!

Reply
Comment_arrow

JimmyJ

9:21 pm on Friday, November 16, 2012

Walt, it's not ok to pay $25K above although some would argue that even administration has to make top dollar. The question is quite simple. How much more are you willing to pay in taxes to pay a teacher what they are worth. It doesn't have anything to do with teachers being held up as some sort of deity worthy of worship. If they do their job properly, they are worthy of no more praise than anyone else who does their job well. The concept seems to be that teachers deserve greater praise because they work with kids. Uh...was that a surprise that they would work with kids, didn't they know that, or were they never kids in school themselves. You can cut the budget to save money to pay the teachers more, so what would you like to cut? Exactly....so again it comes down to how much do we want to pay in taxes to increase teacher salary. As for management ( administration ) if your job is to teach five classes a day are your responsibilities greater that someone responsible for the entire system? If your job is to watch the machine on the line and unclog it now and then is that worth more or less than a person who has responsibility for the future of the business as a whole including you?

Comment_arrow

Walt Hines

11:45 pm on Friday, November 16, 2012

JimmyJ fair enough. Teachers should get paid for their in class time. No more coming in early, no more staying late, no coaching, no clubs, etc...... They present the material at hand to their students, same teaching for all, no special treatment, kids don't get it too bad. Maybe limit the number of questions a student can ask, extra charge for extra questions. No taking classroom work home to grade/look over. Once the teacher leaves their day is done just like the private sector. Phone calls from parents need to be done on company time same with conferences. No open houses with teachers involved unless it's done during working hours. Absolutely no purchasing school supplies or classroom material out of their own pockets. If Mikey has a snotty nose let him use his shirt.

We could in-source teachers. Bring them in from other countries and pay them the going rate of say 99cents an hour. Hey the kids might learn a second language as an added benefit and we wouldn't be out any additional money. Killing 2 birds with one stone. I'd like to see how this one would fly.

It's time we all pay a straight tax, stop sending jobs overseas and equal pay for equal work!

Greg O'Neil

10:08 pm on Friday, November 16, 2012

I think considering the economy, and the fact that private sector workers have had their incomes decrease by 4.8% during the recession, this offer is very generous. We have been in a four year recession with almost a guaranteed 4 more years and the question isn't really what teachers "deserve". It's really about who's paying the increase and can they afford it. We can't keep heaping more burden on the property tax payer as we are among the highest in the nation already. Of course those of you who think the pay for teachers is currently insufficient and you have the extra money for tax increases, they will accept your donations at the school and can pass this on to the teachers. The offer seems more than fair.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Tired Of Half-Truths

10:50 am on Saturday, November 17, 2012

Might want to check some recent figures to make this relevant to the current economy. The recession was marked in the years 2007-2009, according to most economists. We're still in recovery, maybe, but to pretend that we are still in a recession is misleading. Refer to the Bureau of Labor Statistics, and you will see that the average worker in the U.S. has seen wage and salary increases of approximately 2% for each of the last two years. And, contrary to the argument you are trying to make that goverment employees are getting over on everyone while private sector workers are still struggling, you will see that the private industry employees have seen larger increases in the past year over government employees (http://www.bls.gov/news.release/eci.nr0.htm). Just want everyone to see more of the facts than what you seem to be sharing with us.

JimmyJ

12:13 am on Saturday, November 17, 2012

So Walt you are being quite sarcastic but you are avoiding answering the question. How high shall we raise property taxes or what shall we cut. The teamsters at Hostess agreed to an 8% REDUCTION in pay and to pay 20% of their health costs to stay employed at a bankrupt company. The bakers said no so 18000 are now unemployed, heading for food stamps and maybe foreclosure. So what would happen if teachers were asked to do something like that? I bet they would strike. Even though the system is 4million in the hole and the state and country are broke. But as long as we keep the illusion that they are somehow superhuman how much shall we increase our property tax to cover their raise. Equal pay for equal work is fine BUT as a small small businessman I am sorry if you worked for me you would not have the additional burden of financial risk, worries about staying in business, growing the business, etc so yeah I would pay me more than you. This isnt the soviet union or France just yet.

Reply

JimmyJ

12:17 am on Saturday, November 17, 2012

They keep telling us they are here "for the kids" well if so then they should understand that families of many of those kids are suffering financially. Shared sacrifice seems to be the new buzz phrase so why any raise this year at all.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Lil

8:51 am on Saturday, November 17, 2012

@ JImmy J...did you know that the school bus drivers received a 1.5% increase in their salary for the first year? There are a lot of companies that have salary freezes. It is not completely about the money. Sure, it helps. However, what you do not realize is that when most companies have a freeze, employees can choose whether or not to contribute to a 401K or Roth. Whatever they want. If there is a freeze, they receive no contributions to the 203B. If there is an increase, but no steps, then again that is money they are not having available for their future. So it is not just about right now, it is also about the long term. Just like most of us, we are planning our daily lives, but we also have to plan for our future. So if people are upset that there are angry, bad teachers now, imagine what may be if they are forced to longer in order to compensate for the benefits they missed out on earlier in their careers.

Comment_arrow

ConcernedParentAndTaxPayer

8:34 am on Monday, November 19, 2012

Hey Lil, are you aware that Bus Drivers made work concessions that actually SAVED the district money, that is exactly what is being asked of you.

Rex

6:50 am on Saturday, November 17, 2012

Realize that these numbers you read are minimums. Most teachers, who are here for the kids JimmyJ, go well beyond those numbers. Not to mention that teaching all day burns you out; you feel beyond tired after just teaching, then there's more to do! Most of you have played with a child for a while. That's one child. Multiply it and do it all day. Oh yes, and no playing, teach! This district already runs on next to nothing in terms of funds. What you won't read about are the 2 secretaries the BOE approved at 54K each (w/o a college degree) for district office. How about the fact we pay for Wendt's house, car, 100% of benefits and give him an expense account? Don't forget he's still collecting a ton from Iowa. The average 308 teacher salary is about 56K where the state average is about 64K. Yet, 308 is above the state average for ACT scores. I've read how teachers are replaceable. True, they can be replaced, but I don't know how comfortable I'd feel having less qualified workers build my educational house. You don't think those teachers will have the same concerns as well in regards to all this? Last, I think it's comical that the BOE is complaining about the "we didn't approve" staff and are blaming it on an admin(who have since left). Dear BOE, you approve every staff hire. Why don't you blame it on the pencil for writing the wrong thing? Accountability.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Lil

8:56 am on Saturday, November 17, 2012

Rex.. you are amazing!! thank you for bringing up the secretaries!!! I applaud you. It is astounding to me that the secretaries need secretaries. Department chairs don't even have secretaries! And in some cases, like Special Education, it is truly needed. Why are those not provided for department chairs across the board? Maybe if they were in place, then the DC would be able to monitor things even more closely then being bogged down with additional and excessive paperwork.

oh, and I am not sure if people are aware that this district is also UNDER budget.

John Spasojevich

7:58 am on Saturday, November 17, 2012

Rex...let me start by paraphrasing the old "walk a mile in your shoes" saying by stating that I have walked maybe a tenth of a mile in a teachers shoes when I helped run an after school club at Boulder Hill for three years. I saw a lot of dedication from teachers. We also saw many teachers out the door at 330 / 345 for whatever reason, they have kids to get to places too, appointments to keep so they are not necessarily doing a cut and run at the end of the day. That said, I don't believe a teacher needs to be plated in gold and set on a pedestal. Yes working with kids is hard, I'm an amateur at it. But when I volunteer to do it I know there are kids involved and that it will be hard, notice I said volunteer I don't get paid for what I do. A teacher likewise goes into the job knowing there will be kids and not all will be geniuses and not all will be perfect angels. Should they be paid a fair wage, of course. So what is a fair wage and how can the tax base support it? How much are you willing to sacrifice to cover a tax increase to pay someones salary? Yes Wendt is collecting a pension from Iowa on top of is salary. Did you know O'Donnell was collecting a pension from Missouri when he was here making 6 figures? Did you know Doug Galois the construction manager was collecting a pension from 204 when he was getting his 6 figure salary here? THIS BOE was NOT involved in those, the fine upstanding members of previous BOE's made those decisions.

Reply

mike ellison

11:18 am on Saturday, November 17, 2012

These after school committments aren't as extensive as some would want you to believe. I too have volunteered at one of the high schools and the building is very much empty once the bell rings. Sure, there are a few teachers staying late; but the vast majority are out the door. Furthermore, a lot of clubs only last an hour or so, so the teachers are still leaving by 3:30 or 4pm.

The teachers live in the District so their drive home is very short. Compare that to someone in the private sector who is more likely to work elsewhere in the suburban area and gets off work at 5pm and doesn't get home until 6pm.

There's no comparison between teachers who can opt to depart at 2:30 versus a private sector employee who typically works to 5, or later.

Bottom line is that the results that these teachers are getting is awful based upon the state report card. They don't deserve a raise and it's no lose to have them go elsewhere. Oswego is also a very nice area to live in versus some of the higher paying districts to the east that generally have higher crime rates and more expensive housing. The District should not have to compete with those other districts just based upon salary alone.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Rarely Comments

12:20 pm on Saturday, November 17, 2012

Please don't assume all teachers live in the district. I know 308 teachers who live at least an hour from Oswego. Private sector employees are not the only ones who have long commutes. Sure, there are teachers who leave shortly after school gets out but how do you know they are not bringing planning or grading home with them? It is unfair to assume that once the contractual day ends, the work also stops.

Comment_arrow

Mike Francis

1:44 pm on Saturday, November 17, 2012

Well, it's a lot easier to drive home when you get off from work at 2:30 in the afternoon.

mike ellison

11:19 am on Saturday, November 17, 2012

I meant "loss". I sure wish this board would allow for editing of comments; or at least a preview function.

Reply

Chris C.

1:00 pm on Saturday, November 17, 2012

@Lil,
I am afraid you are misinformed. There was no tentative contract signed that this "new" board (which has been together for a year and a half, while contract negotiations have been going on for less than a year)took away. There were only tentative agreements made between the union and the former school admin (Dr. O'Donnell and Mr. Colvin) right before they left, which were never brought to the board, and these are the agreements that the board is honoring. You may want to listen to the tape from the last board meeting where the attorney read off the proposed agreement before you make inaccurate statements.

I also know of no admin, or teachers, that have left since the school year has started. However, I do I believe I read something about how Mr. Colvin has already resigned from his new position....hmmm, interesting.

I certainly hope you have picked up a packet to run for school board since you seem to have so much animosity for the current board.

Reply
Comment_arrow

JimmyJ

2:12 pm on Saturday, November 17, 2012

Colvin is an idiot...has been since his days at Thompson. Obviously they figured him out in the other district.

Comment_arrow

Olivia5307

9:06 pm on Sunday, November 18, 2012

Yes, Colvin resigned from District 214 in October for "personal reasons." Hmmm, only 3.5 months on that job. Maybe the education field isn't for him.

Comment_arrow

JimmyJ

9:19 pm on Sunday, November 18, 2012

@ Olivia5307...geeze ya think! Maybe there weren't any secretaries to enchant in 214. Good for them...he's a J O K E

JimmyJ

2:19 pm on Saturday, November 17, 2012

@Lil....I'm trying to think of a board president in recent times that has had a background in education. Lynn Cullick did not ( unless PTA counts), Andy Young did not, Dave Behrens does not, Joe Guinnane did not and that's going back about 12 years. In fact most boards have been made up of parents and every now and then a business person. You can only vote from the list of those willing to run. Boards oversee the operation via the superintendent. Past boards have taken the superintendent at his word, I guess considering that they really didn't know a whole lot about the ins and outs of running a multi million dollar operation. This board seems to be more hands on which some call micromanaging, apparently because past boards never did. It was the actions of those past boards that have brought us to where we are today.

Reply

TS

9:32 pm on Sunday, November 18, 2012

Olivia you need to get an education and move out of Oswego. How dare you say "our teachers" aren't providing a good education. All teachers in 308 want what is best for kids. YOU are an uneducated fool! You judge Todd Colvin? You must be perfect! I'd love to know what YOU do for a living? Oh yes, judge people! Nasty = Nasty. Your children should be proud!

Reply
Comment_arrow

Olivia5307

6:21 pm on Friday, November 23, 2012

TS, I would move out of Oswego tomorrow, if I could only sell my house. How dare I? Test scores prove me right. Why are you so defensive in favor of 308 teachers? Are you one? You're clearly angry -- direct that anger to your school district, not to me.

JimmyJ

9:53 pm on Sunday, November 18, 2012

@TS...Todd Colvin...lets see when he was first hired, his pay was based on his word to the Admin that he would attain a PhD within 5 years....he's still not called Dr. Colvin. If memory serves he left his wife to carry on with his secretary at Thompson ( now Mrs Colvin) AND when OEHS opened he was the mastermind as principal of OHS to dress himself and the entire staff present at that falls freshman orientation in orange and blue T-shirts that said " OHS "THE" Oswego High School and his reward was to be promoted to Assistant Superintendent. After Joel Murphy was terminated and after Behlow left he gain the title ASSOCIATE superintendent. He is a JERK with a capitol J and an idiot with a capitol I and it's no surprise becuse I've had that conversation with him. if you like him....maybe you should get the education about him and move off to wherever he is if you like him so much.

Reply

JimmyJ

9:58 pm on Sunday, November 18, 2012

TS are you a teacher in the district....if so and you are a fan of Colvin you must have been one of the regulars who played basketball with him in the morning. My non basketball teacher friends tell me that was the best way to get something you wanted done. Play ball with Colvin....boy that sure sounds bad...

Reply

TS

10:19 pm on Sunday, November 18, 2012

I don't know him, I have a problem with people bashing others. Why does it matter what he's doing now? He's long gone from Oswego, so what's the point?? Lets get back to "our teachers" aren't providing a good education? Bs!! I'll stop there!

Reply

ConcernedParentAndTaxPayer

9:56 am on Monday, November 19, 2012

It may be true that our HS ACTs just BARELY beat the state average, but if you look at our 14 comparable Large Unit Districts consisting of Aurora East, Aurora West, Batavia, CUSD 200, Dekalb, Elmhurst, Geneva, Indian Prairie, Naperville, Plainfield, St. Charles, Sycamore, and Yorkville . . . Oswego ranks 9/14 in Reading, tied for 10/14 in Math, 10/14 in Science and 11/14 in English . . . and if you consider Aurora East and Aurora West take the 13th and 14th spots across all subjects . . . that's a pretty sad showing for 308, in spite of having the 2nd highest tax rate. Yes, let's give the HS teachers more time away from students and big raises, I'm sure that will help our students' performance.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Jane Enviere

12:30 pm on Monday, November 19, 2012

The tax rate has to do with the economic base of our community which is overwhelmingly residential versus commercial/business. If you are implying that because we have a higher tax rate, we are somehow "owed" more or better performance, the logic there is seriously flawed.

Comment_arrow

ConcernedParentAndTaxPayer

11:23 am on Tuesday, November 20, 2012

Jane, the point was that the teachers want to be paid like their peers in other Districts. A) they don't generate the same results as their peers (but I know, it's the parents fault or the Boards fault or the Jr High or Elementary curriculum's fault . . . basically anyone's fault except the HS teachers) and B) this District doesn't have the same financial resources as other Districts . . . as you point out . . . and this District is already being taxed at a higher rate than those other Districts. Is that really a seriously flawed logic on my part????

ConcernedParentAndTaxPayer

10:00 am on Monday, November 19, 2012

I'm sure our Districts performance is tied to students just filling in "ABCDABCDABCD" and other Districts don't have any kids that do that. Or maybe our kids are just not as intelligent as others. Or maybe it's our parents fault compared to other Districts, we just aren't involved. Someone mentioned accountability . . . where's accountability for this PUTRID performance at the HS level. No the Board is not made up of a group of educators, but it doesn't take an educator to determine we are getting terrible performance out of our HS teachers. And is it any wondered the non-educated Board voted to change the HS schedule? CLEARLY the one that was in place was NOT working.

Reply

John Graff

10:50 am on Monday, November 19, 2012

Good morning; I have read the comments shared and, like many of these posts, the lines that differentiate the topic are clear. Teachers are good/Teachers are bad. The Board is not leading this district, they are dictating their will and this contract reflects this. They are incompetent and are clearly, negatively impacting our schools.
The 600 lb Gorilla in the room is not being addressed, the fact that this board has not enacted in putting an Education Fund Referendum on the ballot. Their inability to make this decision, because it might fail, shows their inability to lead. We are a group of communities that are devoted to their children's education, but unwilling to pay for this education. Look at Private School Tuition, $4,000-$10,000 per student, per year! No matter how you look at it, until our state and federal funding policies change, homeowners will front the bill! If we do not, this argument will continue.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Paul Lark

12:27 pm on Monday, November 19, 2012

John, lets call the referendum what it really is...a property tax increase. Would you support placing it on the ballot in the April election?

I agree there are good teachers and then there are bad teachers. However, if the OEA wants to make a deal then perhaps they should be looking at splitting the contract into 3 separate groups; Elementary, Junior High and High School then we won't get what is happening now.

In my eyes, the 600lbs pound gorilla is pension reform, not the Ed fund which for all intent and purposes will go towards salaries. What's the financial cost per family on a yearly basis? How can it be fiscially responsible for the district to propose an increase when it doesn't even know the ramifications from the State will be to a home owner.

Then lets' discuss the Federal issue, how many folks will financially survive if Washington can't work a deal in 6 weeks. Tax implications are around $3,500/yr per family increase.

John Graff

3:41 pm on Monday, November 19, 2012

Paul; Pension reform is rolled into my comments regarding educational funding reform. I thought it was a joke that Govenor Quinn rolled out children and a cartoon to emphasize the impact the pension problem is causing. All I am saying is that we, as homeowners, parents and community members need to realize we cannot rely on the state, we need to take responsibility. One thing, win or lose, a referendum vote at the same time as board elections will draw more than 2500 voters!

Reply

ayar

4:16 pm on Monday, November 19, 2012

sorry Paul, I disagree. I don't believe pension reform is the 600-pound gorilla. I think the 600 pound gorilla is the gorilla of bad decisions, the one that place a 170k/yr superintendent into a 250K/yr position from one state to another with guaranteed contributions beyond that, and expect the magic money to keep on coming. To quote Mr. Boehner, "guys, we're broke". Pensions are things people paid into just like we paid into 401K's and such. Good reform would be a cross-state agreement that any retired admin wanting to work as an admin in Illinois would have their money contributed in their retirement fund "of their state of origin". If you're from Indiana, get your equivalent of TRS there, then come here, your Indiana TRS gets put on hold [you're active] and the retirement fund goes to *that* fund, not a separate one from Illinois where you can be a double-millionaire.

Reply

ayar

4:18 pm on Monday, November 19, 2012

The other thing I don't hear in these conversations [maybe a smaller elephant instead of a gorilla] is that Mr. Hultgren, Mr. Kirk and Mr. Durbin are not trying to get the monies that USED to pour in from the Federal Government to trickle back to the states, which would pull us out of this hole.

Reply

ayar

4:20 pm on Monday, November 19, 2012

I have to agree with you Paul on this - I doube a tax increase referendum would go through this round, especially when a referendum passed asking taxing bodies to *cut* 20 percent of their "take".

Reply

ayar

4:22 pm on Monday, November 19, 2012

A good move, especially in PR would be to undergo a voluntary across the board [management and teaching] 2 year wage freeze. But I think we both know it would never happen.

Reply
Comment_arrow

JimmyJ

5:43 pm on Monday, November 19, 2012

Back in the Colvin days....he found out ahead of time that a past BOE was going to do a pay freeze and require them to contribute 10% to their health insurance. He then went to the board meeting and before they could do it, announced that the administration had "volunteered" to take a pay freeze. Master politician, supposed to be an educator. I forget what happened after that year was up, they probably got retroactive raises the way things go around here.

ConcernedParentAndTaxPayer

4:42 pm on Monday, November 19, 2012

Mr. Graff, I'm sure you know from your "productive" years as a Finance Committee member that current tax cap laws are such that in a decreasing EAV scenario, the "cap" essentially acts as a "floor" and no new referendum is required at this time to increase the operating tax rate. It just so happens that the Board is trying to limit tax increases knowing the tax payers can't afford it.

Mr. Lark, elementary performance is better than Jr. High, and Jr. High is better than HS. What's ironic about that is contact time with their students is directly correlated to performance. Elementary is told "it's not the same" ... and it's not. Elementary doesn't teach the same subject and issue the same test to different sections all day, elementary doesn't have groups of honors students and non-honors students, they actually are required to teach different subjects and differentiate their teaching to their students abilities, and ALL at the same time.  Separate contracts aren't necessary, what we need is a union that represents ALL the levels instead of representatives made up of all but one HS person and a union that doesn't feel "entitled" to an automatic 3% PLUS raise every year (aka step).

All of our teachers are extremely valuable, some simply need more improvement than others. This is simply a matter of what this District can afford. You wonder why the contract wasn't put to a vote? Look at the makeup of the negotiating team. They're afraid it just might pass.

Reply

Jeri

5:23 pm on Monday, November 19, 2012

What makes the teachers profession so utterly up on a high pedestal. Is it their union? If a teacher is spending their own money on students not providing their school supplies then shame on the teachers for allowing parents to be so irresponsible. Shame on the teacher. Mr. Graff during your time on the board, the special ed program was a total and complete joke. I actually have documentation on how poor the kids history, testing and appeasing that went on. I feel you are always a bitter angry person. Money does not solve everything.
I appreciate anyone that is doing their job and respecting their employer. From our local business person employing our youth and developing job skills to our teachers.
I would like parents to be parents. I do agree with that. It would help everyone.
401k's for retirement with everyone including the village to teachers to anyone. Be responsible for your own self and not go banging on doors for entitlements. jimmyJ I wish I sent my youngest to private school. Oswego schools are nothing to tout about. They are like everyone else.
On Fox and Friends this morning they had a poverty school improving their students by offering chess in the cafeteria. Many students found it helpful. Simple solutions. Not millions of dollars. Some will help themselves and some won't. That is the real world.
Happy Thanksgiving, may we all see our blessings

Reply

JimmyJ

5:38 pm on Monday, November 19, 2012

Jerri I'm not sure why some people put teachers up on a high horse. Yes they can have a tough job, but sometimes it's not so tough. Depends on the group of students and on the particular system in place for that year, it seems to change often in 308. Their unions are real gems too , one of the few actually able to get what they want by coercion. If both parents work, they know that you can't compensate very long, a couple of weeks at most before your boss starts getting ticked, they know that when they strike, it's a tactic. I'm not a fan of John Graff but at least he stood up and ran for election. We started down the million dollar road when the developers started touting District 308 schools as a means to sell more houses. We can revisit the whole transition fee argument, the developers should have paid more, but then they say they won't build. So who wanted the growth? Probably the Village. It could have been done differently for sure BUT no one seemed to care, the good times were rolling, no one complained about the BOE except a small handful. Now that times are bad the lynch mobs are out for this BOE who is only reaping what others before them seeded. If WE had been as concerned as a community THEN we may not be in the spot we are in NOW. Want to blame someone, look in the mirror.

Reply

Jeri

6:59 pm on Monday, November 19, 2012

yes jimmyj I remember. Nobody paused and stopped to think. I was so glad to hear today a union member actually stating the truth that the unions are political now and simply ask members for their dues through an invoice if they are behind. There is not representation anymore for mutual job development. This current board has their hands full I agree. So does the village and I have more hope in the county board due to changes and messages sent. Ignorance to the truth or blindness to all the facts is our results.

Reply

Jeri

6:59 pm on Monday, November 19, 2012

I want to give you an IEP story; this is about accommodations for special ed. If a student on IEP has reading needs and their homework has reading in their directions in a math assignment then check that box that the school satisfied their obligation to reading. Yes that is correct and I can not explain it any simpler. This comes from the county due to state standards. This is just 1 basis that confirms that this district is no different than any other. Another story I have but cannot post. If I was anybody sitting on the other side of the table with this affecting their student I could never avoid explaining all this. If it falls on parents that do not want to listen so be it, but there are a lot of parents that do listen. This is just a symptom. I wish I did private schools. Oswego is as good as others. There are good and bad teachers everywhere. There are good and bad employees everywhere. I enjoy people that come to their jobs with respect and not entitlements. I am not a union fan at all. Their purpose use to be for safety in the coal mines. Now look what they evolved to. During the high rolling times people did not save and live below their means.
I know most people have 401k or nothing, I have lost respect for that 51% and I think it is due to get worse. I am not sure if I understand what Quinn won with that constitution thing on ballot. I know it had to do with pensions. It’s like a magic show.

Reply
Comment_arrow

JimmyJ

8:05 pm on Monday, November 19, 2012

My student who is now in private school was placed in "special education" and had an IEP (reading & math). Started in 3rd grade. I accepted that the school was doing the right thing. In 4th grade I sat in a couple of the special ed classes.. I couldn't believe what I was seeing. We set about removing him from the program. On that day I walked into the room for the meeting and was faced by 12 school district and special ed co op employees. Two school personnel took my position, that he could be removed form the program. His math score wnt from a C in special ed to a B in the regular classroom. He struggled with reading. In 6th grade we moved him to private school. This year in 8th grade he completed reading Heart of Darkness and delivered an oral presentation receiving a B- and is currently reading East of Eden by Steinbeck for a written report. No special ed. No outside tutors. Just teachers who teach and don't worry about the results of the "job justification test" known as the ISAT. If you unchain the teachers and let them teach, the good will rise above the bad.

Jeri

6:52 am on Tuesday, November 20, 2012

Well JimmyJ you gave me a new thought that maybe I am glad they were half asleep at the wheel.

Reply

Jeri

7:00 am on Tuesday, November 20, 2012

JimmyJ leaving the common school system she now has what she needs. I had to figure it all out on my own. Oswego was not useful for information. I was not ever looking for anything else from Oswego except information from their training and education. (staff) Another something to be thankful for. I am glad we have met success for our students.

Reply

Richard Saunders

7:41 am on Tuesday, November 20, 2012

JimmyJ: You're mostly right about the administrator's pay freeze and benefit adjustment. Mostly as in, except for getting the facts wrong.

Ask any administrator who was around at the time, they were told prior to that Board Meeting that they were volunteering that pay freeze. They were all sat down in a room at Traughber after school one day and told they would be volunteering to have their pay frozen and they hopefully in response the Board would hold off on taking the 10% for a year, but that to expect that would be coming soon as well.

Reply
Comment_arrow

John Spasojevich

10:39 am on Tuesday, November 20, 2012

Richard, I don't see where JimmyJ's comments are wrong from this perspective. There was a closed door meeting you say where the administration was told they would be "volunteering" to take a pay freeze. So who led the meeting? Colvin? Being told you are going to volunteer is not volunteering it's being told what you will do. So in that perhaps Jimmy was incorrect, he wasn't privy to the colosed door meeting and I doubt many iin the community were either. Where Jimmy is right is that someone found out BEFORE the BOE acted publically that they would be seeking an admin pay freeze. Perhaps the BOE told the Superintendent and he passed it to Colvin and then the private meeting happened. Regardless it then gave Colvin the opportunity to appear PUBLICALLY at a BOE meeting and come off as a hero to the community by announcing that the admin had "volunteered" to the pay freeze. As to the 10% insurance contribution, the BOE wanted 20 and I think 20 is a fair number, who gets 100% health coverage from their employer these days? Just more proof of the snake which was Colvin, I never cared much for the guy since his days at Thompson. Can't say I'm sorry he's gone from his new district, but snakes always slither their way to survival.

Comment_arrow

Jeri

4:59 pm on Tuesday, November 20, 2012

thank you Jimmy on the pay freeze history. I remember my dad having a pay freeze I think back in the 70's when inflation was escalating. He was an administrator in district 214. We as in family, all knew that it was necessary due to economic times. I always went grocery shopping with my mom and I saw why and understood to the best of my ability. Today I am not so confident of people going through a time that will be necessary to correct a spending mess. I know this board has their hands full. They have my confidence. We will not agree all the time, but spending is an issue and there are past obligations that have to be met.
I remember a gentlemen posting a current status of IEP within the district and I hear it has improved. That is good. I encourage all parents to research and simply not accept an IEP. Thank you JimmyJ for your assistance of experience.

John Graff

6:31 pm on Tuesday, November 20, 2012

Good evening; To all the parents who believe their children's educational experience is below standards, I have a few questions for you. If their educational experience is so bad, what are you doing about it? Do you have open conversations with the teacher and their administrator? Do you work with your child to support the challenged area? Are you active in your school community through Parent Groups, volunteer at the school or in the Home and School? Or so you spend ypur te being critical and venting on this web-site. i was taught at a very early age that, if I was having trouble I would ask for help and I always received it. Keep in mind the following, our teachers are at the bottom in terms of earnings comparables. They are working without a contract and have been doing so since the beginning of the school year. They are dedicated professionals that spend nights and weekends honing their skills and craft. Don't categorize the whole for the weakness of a few. Last week was National Education Week and what did we do to celebrate that, offered them a sub-standard contract. Way to go Board of Education!

Reply
Comment_arrow

Walt Hines

11:39 pm on Tuesday, November 20, 2012

Mr Graff while I don't agree with you on every issue this one I most certainly do.
I've been here all my life so to see all the complaining with regards to our children's education makes me ask these people why did you move here in the first place. I have an idea that it was for the cheaper big house and all the schools they were going to build just because you came to town. If I were all of you I'd be pretty ticked that someone sold me on a pipe dream too. ( if it sounds to good to be true it probably is) Everything all of you hate about this district can be changed. You can go to school and become a teacher in 308. You can volunteer your time and run for the BOE. You can suck it up with a loss to your home and move. This isn't Naperville folks and Thank God is not.

Someone please explain this one to me. Why on earth would the BOE build multi-million dollar additions on to the 2 H.S.'s knowing that another referendum would not pass.They obviously aren't doing so because of taxes yet we'll have 2 additions sitting empty and paying a hefty mortgage payment. Great job of putting us in bigger hole than the one we're in. There must be toxic fumes floating around the board room and it's clouding their judgment.

Comment_arrow

ayar

1:47 pm on Tuesday, November 27, 2012

@Walt, while I agree with you on a bunch of points at times, I can see why there are additions to the current High Schools instead of a new one. Two words.
Operating costs.
We're still expanding in size, and it's a DARN site cheaper to slap another wall up and make more rooms instead of hiring staff, contributing to Management's "healthy" salary, hire a bunch of teachers, support staff, guidance counselors, etc. etc. probably even a couple of on-site police to keep law and order as usual, etc. etc. etc. security staff, etc. $$$$. Heating. Cooling. You're right, though. You can go to school and become an unemployed teacher [many are looking, and the more experienced ones cost more, so they find it tougher to get a job when they're outqualified by "highly experienced first years"]. You can run for the board and have a lot of phone calls from angry annoyed parents while you're trying to make a difference in kid's lives as Mr. Graff tried to do. I pray for the honest hardworking teachers in 308 to get through these times. By the way, off the subject, can *anybody* explain to me what that weird looking symbol next to Lynn Cullick's name was on her voting signs ? :)

ConcernedParentAndTaxPayer

9:41 am on Wednesday, November 21, 2012

Seriously . . . a substandard contract? Anyone realize other Districts have had teacher pay freezes and this District never has. And this District is NOT at the bottom of teacher salaries . . . althought they are with Adimistrator salaries.

Newsflash . . . there is a $4 MILLION DOLLAR DEFICIT AND THIS DISTRICT HAS THE HIGHEST TAX RATE AMONGST 14 OF ITS PEERS

Anyone care to explain how that deficit goes away by increasing salaries?

Mr. Graff, it couldn't be that you are considering running again and looking to gain favor with the teachers, could it? Sorry to ruin your perfectly good argument with facts . . .

And we are 11/14 in ACT scores, so the solution is to give teachers more time out of the classroom? Oh yea, I keep forgetting . . . it's the parents fault.

Reply

John Graff

11:00 am on Wednesday, November 21, 2012

Dear Concerned Parent; thank you for making my point. All anger and no answers! The principle reason our tax rates are high is because of the lack of a commercial tax base, no industry, no dollars. Also, the ACT argument is not a relevant argument die to the fact that, in the state of Illinois requires ALL students to take the ACT, not only college bound students. Our graduation rate is in the Nineties! I have devoted eight years of my life to this district it's students, administrators parents and taxpayers alike. It has been an honor and privilege to have served this district. Just because I am not seeking office, doesn't mean I cannot present a thoughtful logical opinion. Finally, yes, the teachers have my full support, spend a day in a classroom and you will agree with me that they deserve more than we have offered.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Rachael B.

1:22 pm on Wednesday, November 21, 2012

John, Concerned Parent GAVE you an answer -- With a multi-million-dollar deficit, there is no money for salary increases. And our low ACT score demonstrates that the teachers aren't doing their jobs of educating our students, so why would they deserve a pay increase?? Every student in every district takes the ACT, so that's no argument for our embarrassingly low average score. Just think . . . for every kid that earns a 30 on the ACT, another scored a 10 to average out to 20.

John Graff

11:16 am on Wednesday, November 21, 2012

One clarification to my recent post. The ACT is a relevant and important benchmark for our graduating seniors who are attending college. The state requires all students college bound or not to take this test. Last year, our Senior Class at OHS, based on their ACT scores, grades, community service et all earned over $3 million dollars in scholarships. This is our benchmark, graduation rate, scholarships awarded and producing positive character rich young adults. Our teachers are integral to that success. Celebrate education do not vilify it!

Reply

JimmyJ

12:02 pm on Wednesday, November 21, 2012

@John....yep your posts sums up a lot more then just your point. I sums up the arrogance of a large segment of this community, The ACT score IS RELEVANT AND IT IS SIGNIFICANT. You say it is required of ALL students not just the college bound. So what you are inferring is that the non college bound students are less intelligent then their college bound counterparts and are dragging down the scores. Man if we could just get rid of the dummies then we would be in great shape. HOW DARE YOU! If the ACT scores are down and EVERYONE takes it then the question really is WHY ARE THE NON COLLEGE BOUND DOING SO POORLY. Yeah lets measure the success on the achievement of a handful and lets turn our backs on those who do not achieve. That attitude is a very good reason why you were VOTED OUT and why you should STAY OUT. My recommendation is that you find the same sewer Colvin found and join him.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Jane Enviere

12:48 pm on Wednesday, November 21, 2012

Seriously? Yes, it's entirely possible that a segment of the students who are not going onto higher education will not/do not score particularly well on ACTs. Big deal. As if that is shocking? That conveys arrogance? It's reality. Doesn't mean that those individuals will not go on and have successful careers and lives in their own right.

Everyone is not going to do well on standardized tests. Everyone is not going to go to college. Everyone will not make it through college. Histrionics and all caps don't change that.

Comment_arrow

JimmyJ

2:44 pm on Wednesday, November 21, 2012

Well then Jane...how do YOU measure the success of the district. It unfortunately has to be measured. Do you measure it by the scholarships earned by a handful? do you ignore the fact that in order for ACT scores to DROP there needs to be a significant number of students who for one reason or another do not have the background to do well? if they don't have the background, then why is that? Were they not instructed or does the school not provide that area of study? I find it hard to believe that 308 does not offer instruction. So it comes back to the first issue, does the student have to teach themselves or do they have teachers?

ConcernedParentAndTaxPayer

2:12 pm on Wednesday, November 21, 2012

Jane, what is your point? That Oswego has more students that don't take standardized test well than other Districts? It actually IS a big deal that our students don't do as well as other Districts. It limits their college options and opportunity for academic scholarships.

Mr Graff, you brag about the 3 million earned in scholarships . . . how much of that was athleteic versus academic? And how much more could have been earned if we actually had more students doing well on the ACT.

JimmJ, I guess what Mr. Graff considers to be good government is if we can't afford it, do it anyway and we'll just tax more.

I will have to concede that Mr. Graff actually finally made I one valid point . . . that is, this District has a major homes-to-business imbalance. But that imbalance needs to somehow be addressed by the Village thru their take over of the joint public/private Oswego Economic Development Corporation.

But we can't ignore the financial facts and just keep taxing people more and more when we arlready do that to a greater extent than any other surrounding Large Unit School District.

Reply

JimmyJ

2:50 pm on Wednesday, November 21, 2012

@ Concerned.....the thing is, the lid is finally coming off. I remember maybe two years ago when Dr. Johnson proclaimed everything was fantastic, then someone did some digging and found that OEHS in particular and OHS too were not doing quite as well as she painted. The attitude seems to be if you have a student who is AP or does well, then the system is great, what the hell are you talking about, you are crazy, the teachers are invincible and let the admin spend every last penny they can get their hands on. If you have a student who struggles you find that not everyone in the district is as caring as they would have you believe.

Reply

Jane Enviere

4:37 pm on Wednesday, November 21, 2012

It's amusing that the people who seem to be the most up in arms about everything have left comments that would require quite a bit of any teacher's red ink to correct. I think that explains quite a bit, honestly.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Jeri

5:44 pm on Wednesday, November 21, 2012

so Jane how do you measure success like concerned parent asked?

Dave

5:08 pm on Wednesday, November 21, 2012

So shut the whole thing down. Let's have a vote on whether or not people want to pay any property taxes for their schools. When the majority says they don't just shut down the public schools and everyone fend for yourself. That will solve the problem, won't it.

Reply

JimmyJ

5:30 pm on Wednesday, November 21, 2012

Dave...that's the best idea I have heard yet. Lets have a voucher system.

Reply

Jeri

5:36 pm on Wednesday, November 21, 2012

Dave it might be called vouchers. I would vote 6 months ahead of time because I would be so excited. The easiest thing to do is to teach to the AP students. I actually am not complaining about the district. I truly want to make note that this school district is simply no different than any other district. I do not say anything special about it. My grandmother was correct on all counts...if you do not have the money don't do it. If it is not the full truth do not say it. This district is a place I also want to move from. I will do that also. In the special ed area this district is receiving an incomplete grade from I due to its dishonesty. It should be apparent that it is ran by people therefor realize they are serving people. Tenure is an awful benefit that encourages mediocrity for many. Vouchers will encourage better work performance and some changes in attitudes. I said before there are good and bad teachers, and good and bad employees all over. Our businesses that give our youth employment are just as important as a teacher. Vouchers.......

Reply

Jeri

5:46 pm on Wednesday, November 21, 2012

Wow vouchers are being thought of at the same time. Maybe a movement !!!ha ha

Reply

Teach-its what we do

5:58 pm on Wednesday, November 28, 2012

Thank you Mr. Graff for your continued support of teachers and your service to the district. I have taught in this district for 8 years but do not live in the district.
My children go to private schools and I would like to share a few comments:
1) The class of 2012 (125 students) at my son's high school earned over 10 million dollars in academic scholarships. The average ACT score was 26 this year. Their teachers earn about 10-20% less than I do (80% have MS or PhD) and they do not have new buildings or the newest computers,but great teachers.
2)In order to maintain rigor, set high expectations for student learning and keep the scholarship money coming -the administration keeps their classroom sizes under 24, students do anywhere from 3-4 hours of HW per night and athletes must go to study sessions after school if their grades are below a D. Keep in mind that in the private HS a D is below a 75%. Yes, I pay tuition but it was worth every dime when my eldest son got a full 4 year scholarship to college last year. No he is not brilliant (ACT=28,GPA=3.75) but he works hard and truly earns his grades.
3) We provide transportation to/from school,brown bag lunch and pay extra for music and sports programs. Parents are financially responsible for extras. D308 could do the same + save MILLIONS. I see buses 1/2 empty, district employees washing the PE towels, and F & R lunches in the garbage. Too much waste! Free education yes...free extras NO.
Education yes...extras no.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Jane Enviere

9:39 pm on Wednesday, November 28, 2012

Out of curiosity, do your children's private schools also have at-risk children, special education students, etc.? In the suburbs, I would hardly be surprised to hear that students at a private school are producing stellar results. They generally have parents who can afford to seek out a private education, and those parents are often well-educated as well as ready, willing and able to support their children's academic efforts.

It's apples and oranges to compare a private school with a graduating class of just a tad over 100 with a large public school district. Free and reduced lunches in the garbage or not, that's a legal requirement. It's not like we can cut that. We obviously also cannot legally require that parents transport children to and from school.

I applaud your son's accomplishments - that is truly something to celebrate. I just don't think your comparison is relevant. That said, my family has had extremely talented and dedicated classroom teachers. We have been so very lucky. We appreciate all that the D308 teachers do!

JimmyJ

6:46 pm on Thursday, November 29, 2012

Well I'm a college drop out, my AGI is $40K and I send the last of my 3 to private school. I'm certainly not rolling in cash. Why do I choose to do it? Because after 6 years in glorious D308 the center for smoke and mirrors I finally had enough. I have it a chance through the end of HS with the other two and once they had to take remedial classes to PASS the Waubonsee entrance exam I decided that I had not found but ONE teacher who gave a rats ass in this district.

Reply

Greg Nelson

7:28 pm on Thursday, November 29, 2012

Private school is the way I went with my children. Aurora Central Catholic has been great at education and that missing thing respect! Both my Children have been in top 20 in class and hold 3.90 and 4.10 GPA how many at public school do this? I'm a product of OHS and frankly I can't see why the system is failing with all the cash they have. Yes it cost $$$ for private and it is a tough choice on cash and family but I have two great top kids and both are far, far ahead of what I have seen from public schools of late. I think the teachers teach but with all the noise of extra's they forget the basics (R's) are the focus. Get back to basics people and save the cash for a rainy day - oh wait it's raining and the cash is gone!

Reply

Jeri

11:56 pm on Friday, November 30, 2012

Thank you private education parents...The comparison is stark when it comes to the students and their potential.....I hope Jimmy a path opens for your family. My hind sight is private or vouchers...unless your student is a straight a

Reply

JimmyJ

1:58 pm on Wednesday, December 5, 2012

@TS...back in the day there were more than 25 kids in a class and no aides. So now 25 is the benchmark and some want fewer and there are aides unless they got rid of those. Seems to be it should be easier not the misery we are supposed to think it is. No weapons in the schools either that we know of except the gun in the GOALclassroom a couple months back. It can always be worse.

Reply

Leave a comment