patching...
Update: Are you following us on Facebook? Like us at http://facebook.com/oswegoILpatch
Welcome back, Patch Blogger!

Letter: School District 308, From Bad to Worse

Send your letter to the editor to steven.jack@patch.com

 

I just received my property tax bill in the mail, with another $549 dollars going to School District 308 this year.

Last year the increase was $800. This is in the worst economy in over 80 years.  There is a disconnect between the taxpayer and those providing the services.  No matter how many times we politely ask that the district refrain from increasing tax rates, they manage to ignore these requests and do whatever they want, they claim they need the money. Who doesn’t?  

Oswego residents were already paying one of the highest property tax rates anywhere in the United States.  Aside from employment in the local government arena, there are very few good paying jobs here in Kendall County. 

Many of us had hoped that the new SD 308 board members would provide some relief, but it is not to be.  Huge pay increases for administrators is now the direction the board has chosen. 

Oswego school district is the black hole of taxpayer funds, the money is sucked in, but very little of value comes from it.  It is an overpaid, underperforming, dysfunctional bureaucracy unworthy of community support or community pride. 

The school district is the owner of all property and we taxpayers are simply slaves working to ensure that others have lifetime pensions, health care and COLA increases while we enjoy none of these benefits for our own families.

I think the tax cap that 80 percent of us voted for is an illusion.  What cap?  How can the tax rates go from 5.08 to 6.657 over two years if there is a tax cap?  That is over a 31.5 percent increase when the rates were not to exceed 5 percent or the CPI, whichever is less.  There is NO tax cap!

Sure education is important, but it is not more important than the roof over the heads of our children or the food we put on the table.  I would happily vote to completely eliminate the entire school district if given the chance. 

Privatization is starting to look real good to me, and I do not know why we would not consider it given the financial mismanagement that has led to the highest property tax rates in the country.  How could this be any worse than what we have now?

We attempted to place a new board in power that we thought would attempt to start to lower the costs.  Clearly they are either incompetent or simply have no clue; either way they are failing miserably at that task.

The choice is becoming clear; it’s either us or it’s them in this community.  Many have given up and have left or are planning to leave the area soon, with the smartest of these realizing there is no future in living anywhere in Illinois.

Collectively, the school districts have single-handedly bankrupted the state with their early retirements, pensions and health benefits.  They have literally bitten off the hand that feeds them. 

The reforms at the state level represent much too little, way too late.  Illinois is going bankrupt, it’s that simple and as the really productive people mass exodus this state, the situation will only get worse. 

Somewhere we need to draw a line in the sand, no exceptions and no loopholes.  The schools have totally abused their power to tax, so that power must be taken away.  They have proven over and over that they are neither competent nor deserving of such power. 

In some states school budgets must be approved by the taxpayer, how many of you would approve of what they are doing now?  It’s time for major changes with privatization being the best option.  Get rid of the whole thing and everyone in it and start over.  This is our only hope of restoring private property rights; rights guaranteed in the Constitution but taken away by the tax and spends socialists currently running our school systems.

Greg O’Neil, Oswego

Related Topics: Oswego School District 308

Kathy

6:52 am on Tuesday, May 8, 2012

"Collectively, the school districts have single-handedly bankrupted the state with their early retirements, pensions and health benefits. They have literally bitten off the hand that feeds them."

Mr. O'Neil -- do you receive Social Security benefits? Teachers don't. Do you pay 10% of your monthly medical insurance? Teachers do. I am all for reducing the taxes in this town -- I have had enough. But I'm also tired of hearing that the common state/municipal worker -- whatever category -- has bankrupt this state because of their benefits. Maybe the administrations have; those that know how to work the system have. But the average worker that does their job, takes care of their families, pays their own taxes and hopes for a little something at the end of the day has not. These people pay into their pension just like the private sector employee pays into social security each month. The only difference is that instead of your private employer matching your tax/SS contributions, the taxpayers in the taxing body you work in have to match them because they work for you. Is it a perfect system, no -- but nothing seems to be these days.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Rachael B.

2:41 pm on Tuesday, May 8, 2012

I pay 100% of my medical insurance premiums, not just a stinkin' 10%.

Comment_arrow

Greg O'Neil

3:34 pm on Tuesday, May 8, 2012

Me too Rachael, and my retirement equals whatever I save up after funding 91% of Kathy's retirement and 90% of her lifetime health benefits. The democratic legislators that the IEA helps get elected every year might have spent it, but thats not really my problem. I think Social Security should be the teacher retirement plan, if its good enough for us, its good enough for them, right?

Comment_arrow

Debra

2:36 pm on Wednesday, May 9, 2012

2:34 pm on Wednesday, May 9, 2012

I would laugh about all the statements posted about school districts bankrupting the state of Illinois, if they weren't such narrowly focused viewpoints!! Perhaps we would do well to consider our state legislature's salaries, and yet no one complains about them. They are the people we elected who used the money allocated to school districts for a multitude of other purposes. Just look at their 2010 salaries which are the 2nd highest in the nation!!! Let’s start at the top:
Governor Quinn: 2nd highest salary in the US $177,500.00, plus the Executive Mansion and free transportation and accomodations, plus personal security and food/beverages on business, etc.
Illinois House of Representatives and Senate: 3rd highest salary in the US $67836.00 plus $139 for each hour the legislature is in session.
Illinois Supreme Court Justices (7): 2nd highest salary in the US, $210,819.00.
These are the people who bankrupted Illinois, yet the tax payers of our state have done absolutely nothing about it! Why not?

Comment_arrow

tim

12:01 pm on Thursday, May 10, 2012

I love how these people blame the states woes on the municipal Govt. employees and teachers. We pay our share of our pensions every paycheck mandatory deduction we dont get a choice. now its not our fault that the state and local goverments cant or dont fund those pension plans when they are supposed to so when they have to its a large amount they owe. so take up your issue with the leaders and not the ones doing the work everyday like they signed up for. and if thats too much for you to swallow maybe your just jealous that you have a crappy job with a crappy 401k pension not my problem you had a choice to choose your career path just like we did. so i guess if you dont like it move or tell the State to manage its funds better

Richard R

7:14 am on Tuesday, May 8, 2012

George
I'm not sure where you live in Oswego for your taxes to go up. I do see the rate to the school went up on the tax bills, but on my tax bill the school got almost 200 less then last year, and over all I have a reduction in about 500 dollars from what I paid last year. Sorry yours did not go down.

Reply
Comment_arrow

mom23

8:49 am on Tuesday, May 8, 2012

Richard
You are one of the lucky ones. I don't understand how one person's taxes went down 500 dollars and ours went up to an extra 755.00. (unless you fought the county to have your taxes dropped) I do understand though, that it depends where you live I guess. some are Montgomery and some are oswego. Guess, that makes a difference because if you are in Montgomery you have to pay to fox valley park district instead of Oswego and maybe bristol township. still, it is frustrating. Our tax bill has gone up by around $3,000.00 since 2008. If this keeps up every year, we will not be able to afford to stay here and we want to. very sad.

Comment_arrow

Karen Gerrity

9:52 am on Wednesday, May 9, 2012

I would like to know why some in Oswego haven't gotten a tax increase this year!? Mine have gone up over $400 this year and $500+ last year mostly due to the school district!!! It's time for the peasants to revolt.

Matthew Lenell

7:41 am on Tuesday, May 8, 2012

If you paid an additional $549 in taxes this year, your home value suggests that you shouldn't be complaining about feeding your family and you are quite well off. My property tax went down $12 last year and an increase of $549 would be a 15% increase in my taxes.

The reason your taxes went up is because of the high rate of foreclosure in our area. We still have plenty of children going to school, but less revenue per house means that the school district has to get their money from somewhere so the taxes go up. Essentially the pool is there and is divided proportionally. We have a high tax rate not because of mismanagement but because our population has an inordinately high number of children per household and a small tax base to pull from. A perfect example is right next door: Naperville has one of the best public school systems in the state, if not the nation, and one of the lowest tax rates in the state. They also have an average of 1.6 children per household. If you want someone to blame, blame the people in our community who think large families are a good thing.

Charter schools have proven to be a failure in almost every place they are placed. They give the same education or worse but actually increase the cost of education. Apparently the government has done something right over privatization. You are still free to send your children to a private school but don't expect me to pay for it or your taxes to go down. They will put that money somewhere else.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Karen Gerrity

10:10 am on Wednesday, May 9, 2012

Your logic makes absolutely no sense. First of all we are not "well off" just because our taxes have gone up at such an exorbitant rate. You say the reason for the high tax increase is because of high foreclosure rate. So, it would be beneficial if all those who you claim to be "well off" are taxed out of their homes, possibly causing an even greater foreclosure rate? Also blaming large families is ludicrous. Is this communist China?

gater

7:43 am on Tuesday, May 8, 2012

i could not agree more with greg not george more .no the teachers dont get social security but they do not pay in to it i wish i didnt have to pay for some thing that i wont get

Reply
Comment_arrow

Nikki

12:15 pm on Thursday, May 10, 2012

Like the state pension that teachers PAY INTO, that, at this rate, we may never see?

Henry T

8:14 am on Tuesday, May 8, 2012

It has been interesting reading the letters and comments about property taxes over the last couple of days.
But a $1,300 increase over the last two years, wow...
Was all of that to the school district? Kind of curious what that would be in terms a % of your bill? I am assuming that your property was fully developed both of those years.
Seriously, considering my taxes have remained basically flat (we did get a lower assessment this past year and I know that helped) I am curious why some folks seem to have been hit so hard. There has been variation in the tax rate paid to the school district in each of the counties the district serves in the past, I wonder if that is still the case.

Reply

Judith Vogt

8:24 am on Tuesday, May 8, 2012

Mr. O'Neil is right on. It is time for privatization of the education system. The Feds, State and Local education system is out of control and more interested in the micro and not taking care of business of teaching math and science. Too many rules too much control and way too much money. I just watched Stossel with private charter schools. It is where we need to be. And Kathy I agree that we all deserve to retire in dignity. I will be getting my first social security check this month. I have worked for 45 years and paid all that time. Social security doesn't give you 75% of your salary. The education pensions are way out of line with reality and financially unsustainable. My social security is $1507 a month. Explain to me Kathy how I am supposed to pay $9500 a year on property taxes. School are $7073. For the math majors that is 791.66 per month for property taxes. Which is over half of my income.

Working as a greeter at Walmart used to be a joke for seniors now its a necessity. Know the sad part Kathy. I couldn't even make enough to pay the taxes.

But wait your turn is coming. Wait until you are older and there will be nothing. There aren't enough rich people to pay for all of you. Look at GREECE.

Reply
Comment_arrow

tim

12:18 pm on Thursday, May 10, 2012

your so out of touch maybe if you cant afford the taxes and such your overextending yourself So Move quit blaming teachers,Firefighters,Police

Walt Hines

8:33 am on Tuesday, May 8, 2012

Please explain to me how privatization of our schools would work. I honestly don't see how the people that don't use them would stop paying into the district. Thanking all in advance.

Reply

S Smith

8:55 am on Tuesday, May 8, 2012

Teachers pay into the pension system and no they do not receive 100% of their salary. They receive about 75-80%. The state of Illinois is responsible for depleting the pension fund because they "borrowed" from it to pay for other things. I do agree the board has to go though.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Jane Enviere

9:12 am on Tuesday, May 8, 2012

75-80% after a big fat bump up at the end of their career. I wish someone would pay me an extra year's salary and then use that to calculate my pension. I'm the daughter of retired teacher. Their deal is quite sweet. I'd like to be able to retire well before 65 and have a healthy income for the remainder of my years. As for healthcare benefits ---I've never paid less than 50%, Not all teachers are overpaid and not all teachers are underpaid. But there are things that absolutely need to be restructured. That salary bump is literally nauseating to me, and I saw my parent spend over 35 years planning, grading, calling parents at night, taking classes over summers, participating on committees, and dealing with crazy parents and apathetic administrators. It wasn't the cushy job that people tend to think it is.

I'm happy to see a competent, well prepared, dedicated and well compensated teacher in front of my child's classroom, just as I want to see that same thing in my doctor's office or anywhere else that the job is particulary important. But there is some obnoxious stuff happening in certain areas of education. Everywhere - not just 308. : )

Todd Milliron

9:21 am on Tuesday, May 8, 2012

Please have Bill Walsh explain how he failed to record the meetings being held with potential new district administrators, five times and why the Kendall States Attorney's Office is now being asked to investigate the Oswego School Board for violations of the Open Meetings Act. The excuse currently being provided is "We couldn’t figure out how to run the recorder", it would seem to me one could have gotten it right after the second failure or the third or the fourth, but five times, please?

Reply
Comment_arrow

Travis McGee

1:17 pm on Tuesday, May 8, 2012

I agree, but unfortunately, I don't have much confidence in our State's Attorney stepping up. He's already on the record for advocating a wrist slap.

Mandy

9:50 am on Tuesday, May 8, 2012

my tax bill went up $ 3000!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Reply
Comment_arrow

Henry T

12:01 pm on Tuesday, May 8, 2012

In all seriousness, unless your home was a vacant lot a couple of years ago and you are referring to property taxes you need to call an attorney or check to make sure they have the right information about your home.

mominoswego

10:03 am on Tuesday, May 8, 2012

No one has been discussing the land purchases that were made for the school district and have proven to be useless, Land off of Grove. How many millions have gown down the drain by the lack of good ole conservative forethought. To think Eastview wanted a new library when it was recently renovated. Thank God that proposal was nixed. How many Oswego students have managed to qualify and be excepted into big 10 colleges. I have a few neighbors that have sent their kids to college only to find them back home shortly after because they can't handle the work load. Is the Oswego school district sufficiently educating our children to have the capacity to thrive in the college environment or are these kids being funneled through the system without having any sense of obligation to the children's futures.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Matthew Lenell

11:34 am on Tuesday, May 8, 2012

The high-schoolers who are coming back crushed were probably part of the "block system" that was tried experimentally and periodically since around 2005. It was obvious that people I know were not sufficiently prepared for college coming out of our school system.

Cutting library funds, however, is no way to prepare our children. We need to make it perfectly clear that a top-notch education is important to our community. Shuffling our current board will not accomplish that goal (the older members of the board are responsible for where we are today.) "good ole conservative forethought" got us into this predicament in the first place: we need a forward-thinking not backward thinking to get what we need.

That does not require extra money either, it requires initiative, leadership and strong community and parental support, not seeking to dismantle the system. Naperville spends similar money per student with much better results. They also have the benefit of high property values because people WANT to spend the extra money for a world-class education for their children. Their property taxes by percentage are much lower than ours too. People I know who live there with pay the same in taxes for a 2500 square foot house that we do and sometimes less, but their houses are worth twice as much because of the educational system there. They are, by the way, a center-right community in aggregate which seems to be far, far more to the left than ours.

Comment_arrow

Greg O'Neil

3:01 pm on Tuesday, May 8, 2012

Matthew
You have to teach them how to read BEFORE they need a library don't you? Almost half of the kids in the district read below grade level, do you think sending them to the library will help?

Comment_arrow

Rachelle Stoller

3:49 pm on Tuesday, May 8, 2012

Actually, Greg, yes. Sending kids to the library encourages a love of books which is one of the primary indicators of avid and able readers. Exposure to books is another.

mominoswego

10:13 am on Tuesday, May 8, 2012

Thanks Todd Milliron for that comment on how the school board managed having FIVE meetings and blammed it on not knowing how to use the recorder. SURE!!!! They are a bunch of con artists and the Kendall States Attorney's office is simply giving the board a little nudge on the shoulder to not repeat the offense.

Reply

valerie

10:21 am on Tuesday, May 8, 2012

I've lived out for 40 years and every time there was a referendum and it was passed everyone in charge would start spending that money like drunkin sailors! Then when the money ran out what did they do? They started scaring everyone into another referendum! I've seen it happen time and time again. As for that monster of a school called Oswego East I could see having a huge school like that if it held 6000 kids but it hold no more that the old Oswego High! And seriously do the kids need a swimming pool! That's when I said I would never vote yes to another referendum!! Enough is enough!!

Reply

Donna

10:24 am on Tuesday, May 8, 2012

My tax bill in the Will County section went up $1300 in one year while the assessment stayed virtually the same. HHHMMMMMM!

Reply
Comment_arrow

308mom

4:22 pm on Tuesday, May 8, 2012

You can file for reassessment. Yours probably went up so much to cover all the people who did file for reassessment.

cindy

10:31 am on Tuesday, May 8, 2012

Absolutely agree with this article! If you take a look at the district website, go to the school report cards and look at the school's budgets. Most of the budget goes to building maintenance and administrative costs. That is the real problem.

Reply

Anon J

10:33 am on Tuesday, May 8, 2012

"I think the tax cap that 80 percent of us voted for is an illusion. What cap? How can the tax rates go from 5.08 to 6.657 over two years if there is a tax cap? That is over a 31.5 percent increase when the rates were not to exceed 5 percent or the CPI, whichever is less. There is NO tax cap!"

The reason the District 308 rate increase was able to exceed the tax cap two years in a row is due to a referendum that was passed in 2006 which allowed them to borrow nearly $450,000,000. As part of the referendum District 308 agreed to keep their tax rate locked at 5.06 for several years. Last year we witnessed the beginning of their plan to repay this enormous debt, part two is what we see in our hands today.

Reply

Walt Hines

10:48 am on Tuesday, May 8, 2012

Where does everyone think that rate will go next year, it's going to go through the roof. We might have not used the 450 million but it's sure going to feel like it when we get an increase year after year. We're all going to be forced from our homes! Tax Cap we have no stink-en tax cap!

Cindy, is there any way to get those figures posted on Patch? Those maintenance cost will continue to rise as they continue to build. Someone should have looked into alternative energy and grant money, I know that takes work.

I have to say that Patch has been a great source of therapy and one I can afford!

Reply
Comment_arrow

Jane Enviere

11:01 am on Tuesday, May 8, 2012

The problem is that selling a home around here is no easy feat. Sure, somebody might get a good upfront deal but they won't feel it's quite the bargain come June & September each year! ; )

If they truly assess accurately next year, then I would need to see a $10,000 drop in the net taxable value column. Umm...I'm guessing that won't happen. lol It's a sad situation.

Natasha Dietz

10:50 am on Tuesday, May 8, 2012

My taxes have gone up $1700.00 in three years!

Reply

ayar

11:03 am on Tuesday, May 8, 2012

@Judith Vogt - sorry, but Privatization is not "right on", it's "Wrong Off" in a huge way - keep "Corporate" out of Education. They have ZERO understanding on how schools are different from Corporations [and why they need to be], and are more interested in making a buck than educating a child. If "Corporate" takes over, any kids with special needs probably won't be taken care of as they should or "special handling" costs would be pretty bad. The cost of educating a child would skyrocket. We don't need "private" industry, the makers of the BP gulf disaster, taking over schools. Just like traffic lights, we need rules sometimes.
Illinois is going bankrupt in part because,sadly, Federal funding has been chopped ,yet we can spend billions in other parts of the world and not ourselves - where are you, [Mr. Kirk and Mr. Durbin ????????] and budget mismanagement here at home. Regarding our taxes - maybe a tax cap referendum to get the county clerk to freeze the multiplier ?

Reply
Comment_arrow

Rachael B.

2:49 pm on Tuesday, May 8, 2012

Our administrators are far more interested in spending money on "stuff" than on educating our children. There are a number of education management companies across the country, e.g. KIPP, that have achieved success in preparing students for higher education and life.

Comment_arrow

Judith Vogt

6:13 pm on Wednesday, May 9, 2012

AYAR you are very misinformed. Bill Gates is a huge proponent and funder of privatization and they have proven in many cases that it is far and above producing better educated students. The local private schools have far better test scores and academic ratings than public schools.They also have lower social and discipline issues because they can actually throw out those who don't follow the rules. They don't cater to parents. It is happening all over the country. Illinois is a union state which is keeping them out. In Chicago, people are begging to get into the charter schools. They only accept the best students and those who are responsible and disciplined. The charter schools spend significantly less than standard public education per student.

Comment_arrow

Jane Enviere

6:20 pm on Wednesday, May 9, 2012

Ah yes...Bill Gates, the answer to all things. Not so much. Nor are charter schools necessarily the panacea that people would like to believe. The answer is probably somewhere in the middle. Where you usually find solutions. The problem with that is that it is messy and requires cooperation, something that few are truly interested in embracing.

Comment_arrow

ayar

3:48 pm on Thursday, May 17, 2012

@Judy: sorry to burst that bubble, but Bill Gates is a JOB KILLER in the USA [his old "job bidding" for H1B's and L-1's are still on Youtube http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0BIvffAHsJs , getting rid of people who are trying to make a living wage instead hiring "you want fries with that" wages on the other side of the world. Next, let's read into your comment - quote -"They also have lower social and discipline issues because they can actually throw out these who don't follow the rules". First off, problem kids still can be expelled, and 308 has indeed on occasion done this, and second, where does it stop with no rules or "stopgaps", "sorry, sir/maam, your special needs kid just doesn't cut it - I hear they're hiring at McDonalds and need a janitor". Sorry,Judy, many don't believe in that sort of "garbage" educating. People of all types can do amazing things given the chance. And they deserve that chance.

texson68

11:37 am on Tuesday, May 8, 2012

The pension you speak of was robbed by the state legislature to cover its own financial mismanagement

We teachers now have to work longer, pay in more, with no safety the state will not steal from it again.

Teachers can't get social security even if we paid into it.

Health insurance that we are paying more for.

Salary that is among the lowest for college educated professionals.

Finally if you don't like the tax vote in representation to change it or move

Reply
Comment_arrow

Greg O'Neil

2:55 pm on Tuesday, May 8, 2012

I find it interesting that the government program of SS is not good enough for government workers but it is supposed to be OK for me. I pay 100% of my health insurance, 100% of my retirement and will not receive lifetime health benefits at retirement like you will, however, I will be required to pay into the pot that provides you with lifetime health coverage. I don't get three months off in the summer, two weeks at christmas, one week at easter, 12 paid sick days and 6 or seven other paid holidays. however, I am expected to treat you and pay like you have an equivalent occupation to a college educated private sector worker. LOL!!! My kids are home early again today for the third time in a month, they say they don't do anything on these half days but show up. I'm sure the job has it's challenges, at least for 180 days you are required to do it.

Comment_arrow

Mike N

2:49 pm on Tuesday, May 15, 2012

"Salary that is among the lowest for college educated professionals"

Um... last i checked you only work about 8 months out of the year... So your salary is very comparable.....

ayar

12:03 pm on Tuesday, May 8, 2012

hey Texson68 ,
I noticed that Judith Vogt posted to Plainfield patch as a homeowner about the same issue, back in 2011 very similar, : http://plainfield.patch.com/articles/wheatland-voters-say-no-to-new-town-hall-move-forward-on-needs-assessment#comments - to quote : "
9:29 pm on Tuesday, May 24, 2011
Judith Vogt
I have seen my taxes constantly skyrocket in Wheatland township. In 2010 the value of my home went up $1000 while all my neighbors went down, next door down $20,000. I am assessed $14.63 per square foot for a concrete patio which cost $10.00 per foot to build. That translates to a $30,000 patio which cost $20,000. Kelly Lord seems to think that is a fair value for Wheatland township. My taxes went up $1000 this year mostly to schools. This is just outrageous. I'm pleased to see some people are finally standing up and telling them no."
.........................

Reply
Comment_arrow

ayar

12:04 pm on Tuesday, May 8, 2012

again, just a couple of months ago in Plainfield re: district 202: http://plainfield.patch.com/articles/school-board-members-are-anything-but-cowards#comments

quote:
......................
Judith Vogt
8:23 am on Thursday, February 16, 2012
Judi
SO after all these cuts, lack of funds and increased costs where are you going to get the money to pay for the salary increases and all the payroll taxes included with the increase. Thats like saying I can't make my monthly mortgage payment but I will pay $500 more starting next month. I'm sorry you justified why you cannot afford the increases. Just keep living this fantasy and when it crashes there will be nothing left. The state of Illinois is already bankrupt so you will never get your money.
........................................

is she here or is she in plainfield ? same person.

Comment_arrow

ayar

12:41 pm on Tuesday, May 8, 2012

and by the way, no, I'm not a teacher.

Comment_arrow

Travis McGee

2:05 pm on Tuesday, May 8, 2012

Ayar, you do realize that there are residents from Plainfield who also live in Oswego School District 308? It's possible for Judith to live in Plainfield AND pay District 308 taxes on her property tax bill.

Comment_arrow

ayar

3:21 pm on Tuesday, May 8, 2012

Travis, here was the title of the plainfield article she posted on: "Board Members Are Anything But 'Cowards'
District 202 board member explains why he voted to give raises to administrators and non-union/non-certified staff, and why the real cowards are state officials. "

Comment_arrow

Judith Vogt

6:26 pm on Wednesday, May 9, 2012

Yes MR. AYAR. I do live in unincorporated Plainfield and unfortunately for me I am part of District 308. I moved here in 2003. We are in Will county and were the ones cheated back in 2005 when the financial bigshot at the school calculated our tax rate to be 5.5 and the people in Kendall county 5.0. There were over 500 homeowners affected by this little accounting error. Then they didn't want to give us our money back but tried to do a credit instead. The will county States Attorney go involved and we go a refund check and corrected tax bills. Is there any question why I don't trust them. I am now paying $7073. for school taxes and have never had any children in any school. I can't even go swim in the fancy pool I have been paying for for years because they took away the public swim hours. I also know for fact that Plainfield schools tax rate is 5.27. I wish I were so lucky to be part of that district.

Comment_arrow

Judith Vogt

6:51 pm on Wednesday, May 9, 2012

Mr Ayar this is me also. I live in Wheatland township. AND the people in the township finally said no to the politicians. THey voted down building a new township building because the people believed the township did not need it nor did they have the money to pay for maintenance, heating, and cooling etc. in the future for the new building with a new tax increase. The township has open space they were not using and the taxpayers believed they should remodel the existing building. So yes I am proud to be one of the taxpayers who stood up for our rights and said NO!!!!!!!

Kathy

4:03 pm on Tuesday, May 8, 2012

Just to clarify. I am NOT a teacher nor is anybody in my house. I am married to someone who works in the public sector who works hard and deserves benefits like everyone else. Whether pension or social security. I can't help how the system was set up years ago. I'm like someone who gets social security - I would like some of the money I paid in to be there when my husband retires. Our retirement is in jeopardy just like those who get social security. We have been screwed like millions of other workers in this state. I'm tired of people attacking those workers who are there for everyone, whatever the job.

Reply

Kathy

4:06 pm on Tuesday, May 8, 2012

My taxes are up every year --16 of them in this town. Our income is down; we pay more for services like everyone else. But for whatever reason the public workers can get kicked by anyone & everyone. Let's start yelling at the person who works at a gas station that it's their fault that gas prices are high.

Reply

308mom

4:36 pm on Tuesday, May 8, 2012

Has anyone asked why the Village of Oswego makes it so difficult for larger businesses to open here. There could be huge tax revenues, but people are so afraid of losing the "small town" Cities like Naperville get a lot of money from corporations in their city. You can't have the best of the both worlds. And on a side note - I have a child who graduated from OEHS block system and is doing wonderfully in a difficult 4 year college. Block system is not my first choice and I am glad they are getting rid of it, but if you chose to make the best of it and make it work to your advantage, it was a good system. Instead, many students (and teachers) took advantage of it and used a lot of time for homework and the students lost prime teaching time.

Reply

Angela DeBolt

5:03 pm on Tuesday, May 8, 2012

Mr. O'Neill let me see if I understand this correctly. So you're saying if you to have to pay 100% into retirement and health insurance then we all should? Or is it just teachers and federal employees? Basically anyone who is paid through our tax dollars? And so u think privatization is the key because you will somehow be off the hook. Well guess what you're going to end up paying anyway you look at it. I have a corporate job. My company helps to fund their employees retirement and pays the bulk of our health insurance. You know who pays my salary and helps fund my retirement and health insurance? People like you. People who use the services of our client and buy their products because the money our client makes pays for our services to them. And believe me in the course of your lifetime i can guarantee you have used one of our clients services. So you would begrudge me my benefits because you didn't get such a sweet deal? How is that my fault? Sounds like sour grapes and not very in keeping with the Ideology of capitalism.

Reply
Comment_arrow

kat

9:52 pm on Tuesday, May 8, 2012

+1 well said, not many people seem to understand this.

Comment_arrow

Greg O'Neil

10:31 pm on Tuesday, May 8, 2012

One big difference here, nobody is going to auction off my house if I choose not to use you or your client services. Based on your comments, I see you don't really "get the point". I'm not forced to pay you or your benefits. There is NOTHING capitalistic about public schools, they are a perfect example of why socialism doesn't work.

The public sector unions have been bankrolling the same morons that spent all their pension money trying to buy votes from other special interest groups and now its blowing up in their face. Who's fault is that!!! I've already paid the pension bill once, so if the politicians THE PUBLIC UNIONS have endorsed blew it somewhere else, thats just tough luck. To this day the state is still calculating future pension obligations using an 8% rate of return. The situation is far worse than you think, but you'll be finding out soon because the state democrats want the pension payments to be tacked on to local property taxes. Add another 25 - 30% TO YOUR TAX BILL!!!

Comment_arrow

ayar

10:27 am on Wednesday, May 9, 2012

from Mr. O'Neill : Quote:
"I don't get three months off in the summer, two weeks at christmas, one week at easter, 12 paid sick days and 6 or seven other paid holidays. however, I am expected to treat you and pay like you have an equivalent occupation to a college educated private sector worker. LOL!!! "

okay, Mr. O'Neill - let's do a "corporate" comparison of salaries -
Between the "corporate" version [Corporate Trainer] and the public version [Teacher]
ready? : Here's the average salary of a Corporate Trainer in our area:
http://www.indeed.com/salary?q1=corporate+trainer&l1=60543
$62,000 AVERAGE.

Here's for a Teacher:
http://www.indeed.com/salary?q1=Teacher&l1=60543
$49,000 AVERAGE.

re: 12 sick days - kids get sick *a lot*. Parents send em in with fevers, colds, even the flu, fun times, huh ? all that and unreimbursed supplies [your company supplies you with staples, paper, office supplies, not so much with teachers on a pencil shavings budget]. Oh, and Corporate Trainers can go to the bathroom when they want [Teacher's can't], they can "take time off" when they want [Teachers have a schedule], and Teachers are "under contract" which means if they breach, they can lose their career. Last, it's a fallicy that they get "paid" for those three months - they don't. They make a straight salary, just like you probably do. Summers they simply don't get paid. to put it in corporate-speak, sort of like a summer "layoff".

Carol Anaski-Figurski

6:33 pm on Tuesday, May 8, 2012

Collectively, the school districts have single-handedly bankrupted the state with their early retirements, pensions and health benefits. They have literally bitten off the hand that feeds them. This statement speaks volumes. When do the bonds come due for all this construction and has multi level district consolidation been even considered yet?.I see so much landscape too?

Reply

Colleen620

7:36 pm on Tuesday, May 8, 2012

Unless your an idiot, you would know that that the reason for the increase is because our lovley state is not funding the local schools and owes 308 in particular over a million dollars.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Walt Hines

10:24 pm on Tuesday, May 8, 2012

Colleen you are partly correct. Yes the state is not paying their share and it's going to be that way for some time, we're broke. Our biggest problem is we kept building and building, spending and spending now we must pay those loans back. Our biggest problem was the referendum in the tune of 450 million dollars. We haven't spent it all, thank God, but enough that we will be in hock for the near future and then some. Migration into our district has come to a screeching halt so it's Mr./Mrs. Taxpayer currently here that will be flipping the bill. We are all complaining about this bill, wait until we're served with next years tax bill we're are going to have a stroke. Those additions don't come cheap especially when you add that on top of the debt we have now. It really doesn't matter what side of the fence you sit on, we're in trouble and it's going to be a long hard road until we see some relief. I'll bet most of us won't make it, not at these prices.

Comment_arrow

Robyn Vickers

7:05 am on Wednesday, May 9, 2012

I'm always curious when people say the problem is we kept building and and building. Where do you propose that all of the kids be put if we hadn't built the new schools? We're busting at the seams at most of them today. Even during the worst of the recession, D308 continued to have growth of 4%! People already complain about class sizes over 30 in elementary schools (as they should). If we had even one less elementary school today, we'd have class sizes pushing 40.

Honestly, I don't have all the solutions, no one loves pay more taxes. But I do wish people would take the true big picture in account. The kids are here! Ever take a walk near an elementary school at dismissal time? There are lots of moms with strollers, so more kids are coming! How are we supposed to educate them?

muvin on

8:57 pm on Tuesday, May 8, 2012

WELL SAID GREG ! You are saying things that are running through a lot of peoples minds right now. It is AT that point of time NOW where this system is completely broken. Successful, productive people move here to live and end up sucked dry / penalized by taxation. As far as we knew when we moved here,Kendall Co / Oswego was a heavy Republican area. How, then, is this allowed to continue?

Reply

Robyn Vickers

7:09 am on Wednesday, May 9, 2012

Greg's idea of privatizing is ludicrous at best. As the laws are now, D308 can't just "decide" to go off grid and stop public education. Instead of complaining, let's all work together to push the village to increase our commercial tax base to ease our property tax burden. We can't sustain this 83% residential base much longer.

Every single one of us needs to push our state government to live up to their obligations to education. Stop the unfunded mandates, and start paying what's owed to the districts!

Reply
Comment_arrow

Robert Eberhardt

2:47 pm on Wednesday, May 9, 2012

While I agree with you that a significant part of the long term solutions lies in increasing the commercial tax base, it needs to be noted that the state too, plays a significant role in creating a enticeive environment to bring in that new business, and when you see bordering states lowering taxes, whether or not their actual tax rates are lower, is incentive to move there vs. IL where rates are seen to be going up. Business plans often look out 5 to 10 years or more and then make assumptions on what the average tax rate will be over a very long period of time in order to make their decision.

Russell Pietrowiak

8:24 am on Wednesday, May 9, 2012

Privatization has zero chance of working and shows a lack of understanding as to what the drivers of student success are, parents, good teachers, and an environment of high expectations.
You think your taxes are high now, wait until an unelected body gets control over them. Where will the accountability be. You think this BOE has had issues with open meetings and transparency what do you think would happen if it's all private. The public would cede control of education. Can you image how evolution, sex ed., special needs, etc would be dealt with in a private system. There are no private school systems (k-12) that deal with the amount of students Oswego has that aren't religious. Where is the model that shows this would work? After all we are talking about a system not one school.

Reply

Julie DiCaro

10:37 am on Wednesday, May 9, 2012

I really can't believe what I'm hearing on this site lately. Eliminate the school district, those of us expecting school transportation for our children are "Obamaville" looking for handouts, and the big problem in this area is teachers, teachers, teachers. This is tea party wackitude pure and simple. This idea that you can held back your tax money for things you don't approve (school districts, health plans that fund contraception) of while continuing to collect benefits from the state and federal government for things you DO approve of (like social security, medicare, etc) is, at best, un-American. What's more, this world that people seem to envision in which the government pays for nothing and everyone has to fend for themselves is not and has never been America.

Eliminate the school district entirely? Give me a break. How about merely paying attention to local politics and electing a competent school board that is able to make good decisions with the money they have? I, for one, am happy to pay increased property taxes if the proceeds benefit my friends and neighbors and our community. Our local school district is the LAST thing I would want to see defunded or eliminated.

Reply
Comment_arrow

muvin on

9:40 pm on Wednesday, May 9, 2012

This is exactly the sort of person that I want to come and buy our home so we can get the heck out of here. Please tell your friends who think the same to come buy in Oswego. Most of us, that are selling, have our prices reduced to give away levels just so we can sell. Yep, you are the type we are looking for.. lots of money and don't mind paying huge taxes. C'mon over... please.. so we can get to a state that still has some sensibility.

Comment_arrow

Julie DiCaro

10:45 pm on Wednesday, May 9, 2012

Right, muvin, because I'm one of those entitled, Obamaville, tax and spend idiots who doesn't mind paying high taxes. How ridiculous. None of us like paying higher taxes. But they would go down easier if we had a star district that served our children well. Instead, we're paying ridiculous taxes to have a bunch of self-interested buffoons run our district into the ground.

ayar

10:42 am on Wednesday, May 9, 2012

Well said, Robyn !
actually, though, we also need to push our Federal Government reps to re-fund the State's coffer as they used to before the roof fell in. If the Federal Government poured in what they used to, a lot of it would fix itself.

Reply

Carol Mabus Cronin

11:24 am on Wednesday, May 9, 2012

I just looked at a comparison of Oswego 308 vs. Naperville 203. The source I used says Naperville gets $6.235 million of federal funding through state. Oswego gets $1.969 million. Does anyone know why that is? Our districts are not that different in size. (Not looking for a political answer here, but curious about the process of how those amounts get determined.) Here's the info I'm looking at via Wolfram|Alpha, which I'm shortening into a bit.ly: http://bit.ly/IIUxlV

Reply
Comment_arrow

Robert Eberhardt

2:26 pm on Wednesday, May 9, 2012

Obviously this is a complicated issue, but if the information on your link is correct, Oswego students have an additional $2,220 (18.5%) in expenditures per student and Oswego has a teacher ratio of 19.16 vs. 16.88 for Naperville. This suggests that Naperville is getting a significantly bigger bang for the buck and throwing more money at 308 is obviously not the answer. Your question is still a good one that could use some clarification.

Comment_arrow

Rachael B.

9:32 pm on Wednesday, May 9, 2012

According to the Illinois State Board of Education web site, Naperville 203 receives only 12% of its funding from federal and state sources, while Oswego 308 gets 30%.

Angela DeBolt

5:00 pm on Wednesday, May 9, 2012

Robyn well said. If schools were privatized not everyone would have access to education. Those people would end up being a drain on our society. So we save on taxes upfront but then in the long run we pay for it In other ways. Internationally our students are being out performed which reinforces the importance of what Robyn said about demanding that our state government honor their obligations to education. And I think she's dead on regarding increasing our commercial tax base to alleviate the burden we are all under. I understand Greg's frustrations. I think everyone does but he's off base and his attack on the teachers is unfair. Anyone of us could question the other about whether or not we deserve the job benefits we have but all that does is pit us against each other.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Julie DiCaro

10:47 pm on Wednesday, May 9, 2012

Completely agree. I've been told by someone who lives in downtown Oswego and is part of "old Oswego" that most of the local government would be thrilled to take Oswego back to being the cow-town it was 25 years ago, including the BOE. This is supposedly the reason why it's so difficult for businesses to move out here, and why the BOE doesn't mind screwing over the "new people" who have moved into the area in the last 10 years. Encouraging, no?

Comment_arrow

Rachael B.

1:20 pm on Friday, May 11, 2012

1) Privatization does not limit student access to education.
2) Yes, our students are being out-performed. This is a function of TEACHING, not money. Our teachers and administrators need to step up and do their jobs. (I am a teacher in another district.) It doesn't take money to teach math skills and reading; however, it requires adults who are dedicated to educating our kids.

joe smith

10:14 am on Thursday, May 10, 2012

If the school board was serious about saving money, they'd implement Year Round Education, purge the district of Behlow era adminstrators, and make sensible financial decisions on new hire administrators (their decision for the huge adminstrative pay increase is a disgrace to the taxpayers).

Then they'd get rid of another Behlow relic called Everyday Math which was a political payola that had nothing to do with educating our kids properly in basic math. Ask any Jr. High math teacher their opinion of whether their crop of sixth graders are adeqautely prepared for Jr. High math using everyday stinking math (end or rant).

Reply

ayar

11:07 am on Thursday, May 10, 2012

@Joe, how does year round save money ? people are under the fallacy that Teachers get paid year round - they don't get paid for the summer!!!! their salary would basically go up, and cooling/airco would be kicked into full gear, food services, support staff, etc. everyone would be on the full bill. Research the cost of three months operating funds and you'll probably be surprised.
About Everyday math and all the new "approaches" I have to agree with you, we'd be better off not allowing kids NEAR a calculator until late junior high, dusting off the old school approach, periodically re-quizzing them on it. There are adults out there now that are *crippled* without a calculator in their hand because of all these revamps. On the other hand - we ARE competing internationally just fine when you compare us *equally*. Other countries in their statistics DONT use full inclusion as we were forced to do, which means if you make them include those stats of the kids they "tossed out" of the system [the special needs kids,dual language, etc.], our standing is pretty close to #2 on the international education list. Can I prove this ? go downtown Chicago to University of Illinois Circle campus, and find out how many foreign students from these "well educated" countries come HERE instead of staying out THERE for their degrees. We're still one of the best in the world.

Reply

Robert Eberhardt

4:05 pm on Thursday, May 10, 2012

I couldn't resist commenting on the everyday math. What a farce, what's more as a parent there are not even any text books we can use to assist our children with these ridiculous methods. Even my children’s' teachers in confidence tell me they wish they did not have to use this method. Oops, I may have let the cat out of the bag as I'm not using an alias.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Jane Enviere

4:13 pm on Thursday, May 10, 2012

Totally agree! I've heard the same thing from teachers inside 308. It's a ridiculous piece of garbage. The advice I was given by a teacher was to keep up with the regular flash cards and such at home. They also said that very few students did not struggle with it at some point and that the district has zero interest in hearing about the problems because they spent a fortune on it. The program is a disgrace and there are *many* parents out there who are teaching math on their own at home because they are really concerned about the curriculum.

Let's do fractions this week! Time next week! Count money the week after that! Move on and try some subtraction! Let's do division now! Wait -- they still can't add!

ayar

9:16 pm on Saturday, May 12, 2012

meanwhile, downstate, de-funding continues....what's next? okay, they went after the schoolteachers, the policemen and the firemen so far to "cut costs", couldn't you almost hear "the garbage men are costing the state far too much money, period" from the 747 flying our state reps down to Puerto Rico for a vacat....ahem, I mean, "important trade meeting". Okay, sad attempt at humor....

Reply

Alan

7:41 am on Monday, May 14, 2012

I bought a home in district 308 in 2009. My taxes have gone from $7,900 to $10,700 over that span, up over 35%. I have now decided that enough is enough, and I am moving out of the district. I know I am not the only one that is planning on doing this, three of my neighbors are doing the same... Way to go district 308, you are successfully shooting yourself in the foot.

Reply

john

9:06 am on Monday, May 14, 2012

with taxes skyrocketing and the sherrif kicking grama and grandpa out of there houses for not paying taxes will this town become a boarded up vacant empty place like the old alexander lumber building? If so how will 308 surive they need our tax money

Reply

Oswegoraised

10:10 am on Monday, May 14, 2012

All I know is 3 people ran with ONE objective. No 3rd high school. After that they seem lost and clueless. Remember 3 names next election. Walsh, Lightfoot, and Swanson.

Reply

ayar

10:47 am on Monday, May 14, 2012

@Oswegoraised,
(1) No third high school - let's get to that for a second. In a perfect world [not having to pay through the nose for it] it's not a bad idea to have one. But we simply can't afford it.
(2) Walsh, Lightfoot, and Swanson - what about the others ? tell me, did you think outsourcing our busing [putting locals out of work] is a good idea? I heard a rumor that we're getting our Lawns mowed, etc. not by staff but by $private$ $contract$ ? how about snow blowing ? a lot of smaller towns usually have the coffee-drinking guy in the flannel shirt do a ton of that sort of thing, what's wrong that our Maintenance staff can't do it ? can we come to an arrangement with LeClerc and the township to help with these chores ? these are things that have occurred under the *old* guard, not all the problems happening are with the new board. How did the old guard vote in terms of these "raises" to new hires ? did they also raise the bar "back in the day" ? if so, why ? that's the pain of having to be objective. I try to remember that these guys aren't getting paid to do this, they do this out of their own personal need to make things better, which I respect. If you want to look for the guy in the black hat and boots, look to the one who raises the multiplyer - looks like people noticed already: http://oswego.patch.com/blog_posts/kendall-county-property-tax-revolt

Reply

Oswegoraised

11:17 am on Monday, May 14, 2012

1) I agree. Can't afford it. 2) I hear what you're saying, but the new was elected in to fix the old. I went through this school system when it was one of the best. That's what brought people here. More house for the money, lower taxes, and good school district. Not to mention the home town atmosphere. We all have our opinions on what happened to the middle two, but we can all agree something needs to be done. I read the article you supplied the link to and will be attending. Thank you for that information.

Reply

Greg O'Neil

11:28 am on Monday, May 14, 2012

When I wrote this letter I knew very well that EVERYONE wouldn't like it, after all there are a bunch of freeloaders getting their services for a fraction that they cost others. They think thats fair!!! My address in no way represents "my fair share" of the tax burden. Its a flawed system that does more harm to people than good. I am glad that the topic elicited so much debate. I am really only hoping to appeal to 51% OF THE PEOPLE WHO WILL BE VOTING IN FUTURE ELECTIONS!!!
BTW I'll be seeing many of you at Mark Johnson's taxpayer revolt on June 1, way to go Mark.

Reply

Leave a comment